Tuesday

9th Aug 2022

Hungary triggers rule of law 'debates' in EU council

  • Hungary's PM Viktor Orban has spooked the EU and the US with his talk of 'illiberal democracy' (Photo: The Council of the European Union)

Telling an EU member state that its laws are undemocratic is a tricky affair. Especially if the country's government has a broad majority in its national parliament. And if the prime minister still enjoys the respect of some of his fellow EU leaders.

Such was the case with Hungary, whose Prime Minister Viktor Orban in 2012 put in place a series of constitutional changes using his super-majority in the national parliament. They affected media freedom and the independence of the judiciary and prompted the EU to start looking at the laws and even take the country to court.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Last year, four foreign ministers, including the then Dutch foreign minister and now EU commission vice-president Frans Timmermans, wrote a letter to the EU commission asking for a new "rule of law mechanism".

It would be a type of monitoring system before the triggering of the "nuclear option" of article 7 of the EU treaty, the suspension of voting rights in the EU council.

The EU commission put out a discussion paper looking at the options, but was immediately told by the EU council’s legal service that it was overstepping its powers. The "discussion was all but killed," according to one diplomat.

But Italy revived the debate by making the issue one of the priorities of its six-month presidency of the EU council.

Following Rome’s push, EU affairs ministers on Tuesday (18 November) agreed to hold “regular debates” on the rule of law in member states.

Italian EU affairs minister Sandro Gozi said it was a matter of the EU’s "credibility" that it does not become "a Union that is so thorough on economic parameters and forgets that the reason why it exists is the rule of law."

EU citizens "are asking why we are so demanding on the rule of law when we have a candidate country and once it becomes a member it becomes a black box, no questions are asked about the rule of law," he added.

According to the Italian presidency paper, seen by EUobserver, the council debates will be based on a series of "principles": the powers of EU institutions, the respect of "national identities, inherent in their political and constitutional structures" and the principle of "sincere cooperation".

The paper says ministers should agree on how many times these discussions should take place "e.g. once per year, within the General Affairs Council", what "sources of information could be considered worthy and reliable" and how to best observe the principles agreed.

A final decision may be taken in December or be left for the upcoming rotating EU presidencies - Latvia and Luxembourg - to pick up.

Timmermans vs. Timmermans

Meanwhile, Frans Timmermans, in his new capacity as vice-president of the EU commission, avoided giving a clear answer on whether he will continue with the "rule of law mechanism" he requested as foreign minister.

On Wednesday, he welcomed the decision to hold regular talks and said it was "extremely important" for member states to have a place for "political discussions" on the rule of law after they join the EU.

Timmermans added that the council debates will be "complementary" to what the commission can and will do.

A spokeswoman for the EU commission said the "mechanism" proposed by ex-justice commissioner Viviane Reding stays in place and can be activated at any time, despite the negative legal opinion of the council.

But the debate suffers from a lack of political will given that no country wants to be put in the spotlight, says Sergio Carrera from the Centre for European Policy Studies, a Brussels-based think tank.

"For me it’s not a surprise that the council concluded just to have discussions on the rule of law. But the first step is political willingness and even in the European Parliament there is no consensus on it," Carrera noted.

US diplomat lashes out at Hungary's Orban

Victoria Nuland, the US' top diplomat on Europe, has indirectly criticised Hungarian leader Viktor Orban for the “cancer” of “democratic backsliding”.

Orban demonises immigrants at Paris march

A French press watchdog has highlighted the hypocrisy of some VIPs at Sunday’s march in Paris, while Hungary’s Orban used the event to call for a crackdown on immigration.

EUobserved

How to build an illiberal democracy in the EU

With Brussels increasingly worried by Poland, we take a look how Hungary's Viktor Orban created a template for dismantling democratic checks and balances inside an EU state.

Column

Albania's post-communist dream has lessons for Ukraine

Comparisons between post-communist Albania and current-day Ukraine are fascinating — and make many pertinent parallels. Ukrainians have a similar determination to belong to "the rest of Europe" as Albanians.

Opinion

Finally, the victims of Utøya got a memorial

A legal battle between locals on the one hand and the state and the labour youth organisation on the other side postponed the inception of the memorial in remembrance of the victims of Anders Behring Breivik.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us