Thursday

7th Jul 2022

First days of COP26 summit marked by chaos and 'outrage'

  • The Scottish government fears COP26 could lead to a increase of Covid-19 infections (Photo: Simon Evans Twitter)
Listen to article

The first four opening days of the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow (COP26) has been marked by heavy weather, travel disruption, large crowds, Covid-19-related restrictions, and long queues outside the conference centre – which have triggered criticism of the organisers of the conference.

As more than 25,000 delegates from almost 200 countries meet for a total of two weeks, large queues have been building up the entrance of the venue - sparking fears about a potential spike in Covid-19 cases.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Scottish health secretary Humza Yousaf admitted earlier this week that the "scale and worldwide draw" of the summit "poses a risk of spread of Covid-19 both within delegates and to or from the local population of Scotland and the UK".

But a COP26 spokesperson told EUobserver on Wednesday (3 November) that the UK presidency was working with the UN "to minimise queues as much as possible".

"Everyone's safety and security at COP26 is of the utmost importance," the official added, pointing out that there are Covid-19 mitigation measures in place, such as ventilation and hygiene measures, facemasks, daily tests, and social distancing.

Entering to the summit took so long on Monday morning that members of delegations from Maldives, Nepal and Russia missed their meetings, BBC reporter Mishal Husain tweeted.

Attendees received an email from the organisers apologising for the inconveniences caused when trying to enter the venue, citing "unprecedented logistical circumstances".

On Wednesday, however, they were told to follow negotiations online as much as possible and attend events in person only when necessary "in order to comply with Covid-19 measures".

Delegates from poorer countries have struggled to attend the event due to the unequal access to vaccines, quarantine rules and high travel costs - which triggered civil society to call for the postponement of the event earlier this year, citing unequal participation.

The UK has, since the beginning, rejected the idea of postponing the event, and instead put forward measures to ensure the participation of developing countries, such as funding the hotel stays of delegates arriving from red-list countries.

Nevertheless, campaigners have slammed the British government for failing to host the "most-inclusive COP ever" - a promise COP26 president Alok Sharma, a British Conservative MP, made earlier this year.

Restricted access

One of the biggest concerns raised during the first days in Glasgow has been the restricted access to negotiating areas for environmental and development organisations.

Sebastien Duyck, senior attorney at the Centre for International Environment Law, said there was "outrage" and "disappointment" among observers because many had travelled to Glasgow despite the economic cost and the health risks to be involved in the negations on the ground.

"We need the voices of those who are directly impacted by climate change to inform the negotiation and to provide public scrutiny," he said, adding that "Covid-related restrictions cannot justify the fact that our entire network cannot access negotiations".

The UK presidency had a total of 24 months to prepare the event, after it was delayed a year due to the pandemic.

Only four representatives of environmental and development NGOs had access to the negotiations, Duyck said, arguing that these first days have marked "the least-inclusive beginning of a COP since over a decade".

'Dystopian Hellscape'

Alexandria Villaseñor, a youth activist from the United States, called the conference a "dystopian Hellscape."

"An exclusionary, racist, ableist, classist environment directly informs the decision making process that is placed in it," she told her thousands of followers on Twitter.

Over the weekend, train disruptions and road closures also made it difficult for delegates to get from London to Scotland.

But criticism has been focussed on reports accusing global leaders of hypocrisy - after travelling from and to Glasglow by private jets, which are considered 20 times more polluting than a commercial flight.

According to the BBC, there have been 182 such flights into Glasgow, Prestwick, and Edinburgh airports since 27 October - which is nearly double the amount of the previous week.

And this figure excludes some national charters, such as US president Joe Biden's Air Force One plane.

After the leaders' meeting on 1 and 2 November, UK prime minister Boris Johnson decided to travel from Glasgow to London by so-called 'air taxi' due to "time constraints". According to Downing Street, the plane uses a special mix of "sustainable" aviation fuel.

Similarly, the plane flying the European Commission's delegation to Glasgow is "powered by biofuels," a spokesperson told EUobserver, while refusing to confirm whether or not it was a private jet.

The European Council and the Parliament have not responded to questions about the use of air taxis to travel to COP26.

Opinion

COP26 and the Congo rainforest - a 'Made in Europe' problem

After it was discovered that the Amazon no longer absorbs carbon, the Congo rainforest – soaking up some 1.2bn tonnes of carbon dioxide each year – is arguably one of our last lines of defence against climate change.

Greta Thunberg leads pan-Europe COP26 climate protests

In total 50 financial centres around the world were targeted on Friday to usher in the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, also known as COP26, with Greta Thunberg in the City of London.

Analysis

COP26 climate summit: could it be different this time?

World leaders and national negotiators from almost 200 countries will meet in Glasgow next month to discuss global cooperation in response to the climate change emergency. What outcome can be expected? Why does it matter?

Analysis

Can the private-finance $130 trillion climate bet be trusted?

A group of 450 banks and insurers, led by Mark Carney, have committed €112 trillion to tackle climate change between now and 2050 - but not all green projects are bankable raising questions about the for-investor profit model.

News in Brief

  1. British PM defiant amid spate of resignations
  2. France says EU fiscal discipline rules 'obsolete'
  3. Russia claims untouchable status due to nuclear arsenal
  4. Catalan MEPs lose EU court case over recognition
  5. 39 arrested in migrant-smuggling dragnet
  6. France to nationalise nuclear operator amid energy crisis
  7. Instant legal challenge after ok for 'green' gas and nuclear
  8. Alleged Copenhagen shooter tried calling helpline

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. Is Orban holding out an olive branch to EPP?
  2. EU should freeze all EU funds to Hungary, says study
  3. Legal action looms after MEPs back 'green' nuclear and gas
  4. EU readies for 'complete Russian gas cut-off', von der Leyen says
  5. Rising prices expose lack of coherent EU response
  6. Keeping gas as 'green' in taxonomy vote only helps Russia
  7. 'War on Women' needs forceful response, not glib statements
  8. Greece defends disputed media and migration track record

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us