Sunday

5th Feb 2023

Tensions foreseen over push to link climate funds to rule of law

  • Linking the climate fund to the rule of law would especially affect Hungary and coal-dependent Poland (Photo: Kris Duda)
Listen to article

Leading MEPs want to make access to the EU's climate funds conditional on member states' adherence to democracy and the rule of law - as part of the fightback against democratic backsliding.

The proposal, however, is likely to aggravate existing tensions with Hungary and Poland over judicial independence, potentially harming vulnerable citizens and small businesses.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The €72bn new climate fund aims to help tackle energy poverty in the EU and overcome some member states' reluctance to expand carbon-pricing policies to the building and road transport sectors.

And it could also counteract a possible public backlash against climate measures.

But EU member states that do not adhere to the principles of the rule of law and fundamental values should not be beneficiaries, Esther de Lange and another conservative lawmaker, David Casa from Malta, said in a draft report.

"Certain countries, of course, won't like it but the rule of law is so fundamental that it should be a condition sine qua non," de Lange told a news conference on Thursday (10 February)

The proposal would especially affect Hungary and coal-dependent Poland, which have both already been put under the Article 7 sanctions procedure over corruption and judicial independence issues.

And it would likely become a controversial issue in final negotiations with the EU council, aggravating intra-EU tensions even further.

"Linking the fund with the rule of law may cause some controversy…[because] there is a risk that doing so could limit the ability to benefit those who need it the most," an EU diplomat told EUobserver.

The European Commission is currently holding up post-pandemic recovery funds to Hungary and Poland, sparking rows not only with Warsaw and Budapest but also with MEPs.

Next week, the European Court of Justice will rule on the legality of the novel conditionality mechanism, which allows the bloc to suspend EU funds if a member state does not respect the rule of law.

But linking climate transition funds to the rule of law could be another motivation for member states to comply with EU law, according to Zsolt Darvas from the Brussels-based think tank Breugel.

"This will provide further incentives to comply with EU rule of law standards. Not benefiting from the fund will not improve the social situation in these countries and then they will have to find resources from elsewhere, which could prove to be difficult," Darvas said.

The European Commission proposed the "social climate fund" last summer as part of its Fit-for-55 package to support the energy transition for poor households over the 2025-2032 period.

EU orders Poland to pay €70m in fines

The case is one of many disputes between the EU and Poland's ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, which have started to cost money for Warsaw.

Macron gloomy on rule of law after meeting Orbán

French president Emmanuel Macron said Hungary does not intend to settle the rule-of-law concerns by its general election next April, and will not have EU funds available until then.

Opinion

A German judge: my fears on rule of law in EU

As a German national, I see German history as a constant warning to defend the rule of law - and to be vigilant to detect even the slightest beginnings of its erosion.

Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'

The European Central Bank raised interest rates by another 0.5 percent to a 14-year high, and expects to hike rates by another half percent in March. But what does that mean for the green transition?

Opinion

More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies

Industrial energy-intense sectors, outside Germany and France, will not move to the US. They will go bust, as they cannot compete in a fragmented single market. So to save industry in two member states, we will kill the rest?

Latest News

  1. Greece faces possible court over 'prison-like' EU-funded migration centres
  2. How the centre-right can take on hard-right and win big in 2024
  3. Top EU officials show Ukraine solidarity on risky trip
  4. MEPs launch anonymous drop-box for shady lobbying secrets
  5. Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'
  6. MEPs push for greater powers for workers' councils
  7. How Pavel won big as new Czech president — and why it matters
  8. French official to take on Islamophobia in EU

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us