Tuesday

19th Mar 2024

EUobserved

MEPs in Strasbourg: everywhere but the plenary

  • Perception matters in politics. Romanian MEP Cristian Dan Preda (EPP) during the EU parliament debate with Romanian prime minister Viorica Dancila, surrounded by empty seats. (Photo: European Parliament)

Print is not dead, at least not in the European Parliament.

On Tuesday (15 January), during a plenary debate with Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz, two centre-right German MEPs could be seen reading newspapers.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • British Conservative MEP Nirj Deva, amid empty chairs (Photo: European Parliament)

Something was amusing, apparently. MEP Werner Langen showed the front page of the broadsheet Bild newspaper to his European People's Party (EPP) colleague Jens Gieseke, who laughed.

In any case, the contents of Bild, and several other newspapers, were apparently more interesting to Langen than his colleagues' speeches, delivered in response to Kurz' opening statement.

Gieseke could also be seen writing postcards.

This is not to pick on these two MEPs in particular, or the EPP, the largest political group in the European Parliament, in general.

Watching MEPs' behaviour during the plenary session in Strasbourg shows that members from across Europe and from all political backgrounds display behaviour that a school teacher would not allow.

They walk around to chat with other MEPs, leave the room to take a phone call, or make that all-too-familiar scrolling movement on their smartphone or tablet, to refresh a social media page.

Even Kurz himself seemed not to listen to one of the MEPs at one point, while typing on his smartphone instead.

The chancellor was there to discuss the achievements of Austria's six-month EU presidency.

In their defence, the typing can sometimes be related to sending out tweets with comments on the debate.

But EPP member Wim van de Camp told EUobserver that, on one occasion, he saw a fellow MEP visiting an online shoe shop while in the plenary chamber.

At least they were there

Meanwhile, Gieseke, Langen, and some others had, at least, bothered to show up.

When the debate with Kurz began on Tuesday morning at 10:30AM, EUobserver counted a mere 52 MEPs in the plenary hall - there are 750 of them, excluding the president.

This number increased to 132 by the end of the debate, which was, in any case, more a collection of short speeches than a genuine discussion.

There was also a strong correlation between the amount of praise and how close that MEP's political party was to the ideology of Kurz.

The format was one of the reasons why many MEPs skipped it: there were no opportunities for spontaneous interventions, but only for speeches from one MEP from each of the eight political groups (and one independent member), which had been scheduled in advance.

In that sense, MEPs might as well watch it on TV screens in their offices instead.

Another reason given to EUobserver was that it was not so useful to have a debate looking back at the last six months.

In that sense, a debate with Romania's prime minister ought to have attracted a larger audience, since Romania took over the EU presidency from Austria on 1 January for the next six months.

But Romanian leader Viorica Dancila also faced a tiny group of MEPs (69) when she spoke at the EU assembly on Tuesday.

Sorry you have left

Liberal leader Guy Verhofstadt, a Belgian MEP, heavily criticised the centre-left Romanian prime minister, expressing his worry about the state of rule of law in the eastern European country, which joined the EU in 2007.

But by the time Dancila's slot to respond had come up on the clock, the former Belgian prime minister had left.

"Mr Verhofstadt, I am sorry you have left the chamber already," she said.

The debates with government leaders on the future of Europe, introduced by EU parliament president Antonio Tajani after the vote for Brexit in 2016, seem to be working better than the presidency ones.

The debate with Spanish prime minister Pedro Sanchez, on Wednesday, was at least better attended, with some 200 MEPs present.

It overran by some 40 minutes, as dozens of MEPs wanted to ask Sanchez a question or give a comment.

Really busy

German Green MEP Ska Keller told EUobserver that one cannot expect MEPs to attend plenary all of the time - it is something they do only when it is time to vote on legislative files and resolutions.

During the 12-times-a-year Strasbourg sessions, MEPs also have meetings with their own political groups, discussions on bills, meetings with journalists, and host visitors.

"I don't expect all the members to sit here, because then they are not doing their other work," said Keller.

"We have a crazy amount of legislation on all of our desks. We're all really busy," she added.

On top of this, much of the actual political negotiations get done at committee level, in Brussels. That sometimes makes tabling it to the plenary a rubber-stamping exercise.

Dutch MEP Wim van de Camp, for example, presented a resolution on autonomous driving on Monday evening.

He said four people showed up.

"I am not so sensitive, so I can handle it, but it was disappointing," said Van de Camp.

He noted that the practice of empty chambers was not limited to the EU parliament, as did some of his colleagues.

"If you look at national parliaments you will see absolutely the same thing: there are always complaints there about empty chambers unless it's a moment of big political theatre," said British Greens MEP Jean Lambert.

While that may be the case, there is a still a big difference.

The European level of government is not as self-evident as the national one.

The very existence and need of the EU is being put to the test, with a key member state now planning to leave.

It is why there is perhaps more criticism of those parts of the EU's decision-making process that happen behind closed doors, while such practices are deemed perfectly acceptable at national level.

More than ever, MEPs have to be on their best behaviour.

To individual MEPs it may seem unfair that they are being scrutinised closer than MPs at home.

Perhaps they are right. But the effect of their actions on the image of European politics cannot be dismissed.

The European Parliament has had to fight hard to be taken seriously by government leaders.

Citizens going to the polls in May to vote in the next generation of MEPs might well expect their EU representatives to at least show up during important debates with European leaders.

If the format of the debate is not sexy enough, then the parliament is free to change the set-up.

And one important change could be the order of speakers.

As things stand, the invited guest gives a speech and is followed by several rounds of MEPs' speeches, in the order of group size.

To her credit, Romanian PM Dancila was frantically scribbling during those rounds, and made an effort to answer each MEP's address individually.

But there are also cases of leaders of European Commissioners who use the 'bulk method' of answering all MEPs at the same time, so as to respond only to the easiest questions.

Nothing new

Absenteeism during debates with government leaders is nothing new.

According to the book The European Council by Dutch veteran journalist Jan Werts, a presidency debate in 2005 was attended by less than 10 percent of MEPs.

In 2017, EU commission president Jean-Claude Juncker called the EU parliament "very ridiculous" for showing up in low numbers to hear Malta's PM speak - although six months later he made no such remarks when Estonia's PM had a similarly small audience.

But an empty chamber sends an important message to the speaker, who needs to feel that their actions are being closely monitored by democratically elected MEPs.

Few MEPs also showed up for a debate with Mario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank (ECB), which is in charge of the eurozone's monetary policy (Photo: European Parliament)

EU commissioner for the euro Valdis Dombrovskis articulated the issue at stake at Tuesday's debate with the ECB chief.

"A debate on the European Central Bank's activities by the European Parliament is an important manifestation of democratic accountability," he said.

But by EUobserver's count, less than 30 MEPs were in the room listening to Draghi's speech.

Considering how important the euro is to citizens' daily life, and, consequently how vital democratic control of the independently operating ECB ought to be, the contrast was all the more striking with a debate that happened the next day.

On Wednesday morning, more than 200 MEPs showed up to a debate that started at 8:30AM.

It was a discussion about the outcome of the vote in the House of Commons on the Brexit withdrawal deal.

An interesting issue for sure, but something which MEPs can do absolutely nothing about.

Perhaps a shift in priorities is in order.

Fewer MEPs than visitors turn up for Estonian PM

Less than seven percent of MEPs watch Estonian prime minister's speech in the European Parliament in Strasbourg. More visiting students showed up than MEPs, prompting questions of the value of such sessions.

MEPs look for ways to battle plenary non-attendance

The European Parliament is looking into ways of boosting plenary attendance during debates but is set to stay clear of fining absent deputies after a brief attempt to go down this path earlier this month was widely ridiculed.

Magazine

Explained: What is the European Parliament?

While domestic political parties often use the European Parliament as a dumping ground for unwanted politicians - and a majority of citizens don't bother to vote - the parliament, over the years, has become a dominant force in the EU.

Opinion

How the EU can raise its game in the Middle East

Could the EU repair its reputation and credibility by taking action on Gaza? EU foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell, Spain, Belgium and Ireland, have worked hard to repair the damage, but have faced political headwinds due to internal divisions.

Latest News

  1. Borrell: 'Israel provoking famine', urges more aid access
  2. Europol: Israel-Gaza galvanising Jihadist recruitment in Europe
  3. EU to agree Israeli-settler blacklist, Borrell says
  4. EU ministers keen to use Russian profits for Ukraine ammo
  5. Call to change EIB defence spending rules hits scepticism
  6. Potential legal avenues to prosecute Navalny's killers
  7. EU summit, Gaza, Ukraine, reforms in focus this WEEK
  8. The present and future dystopia of political micro-targeting ads

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us