Friday

27th May 2022

UEFA lose legal battle on free-to-air football

  • Governments have to right to put all World Cup matches on free TV channels (Photo: bildungsr0man)

EU governments have the right to ensure that international football championships are available on free-to-air television channels, according a court ruling on Thursday (18 July).

The judgement by the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice (ECJ) dismissed appeals by FIFA, which runs the World Cup, and the European governing body UEFA.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The case had been brought by the two governing bodies after Belgium and the United Kingdom had each included all the games in the final stages of the World Cup as part of a list of the sporting events that had to be available on free-to-air channels. The UK also included the matches in the Euro-2012 championship.

Under EU broadcasting law, governments are allowed to designate big sporting events as being of "major importance" to their country even though this goes against the spirit of EU competition law. However, governments are required to formally set out their justifications to the European Commission.

In both cases, the list included matches involving neither the Belgian or English national teasm, but the EU executive arm approved the requests.

FIFA and UEFA challenged the original decision to uphold the list made by the EU's General Court in February 2011, arguing that not all those matches could constitutes events of major importance for the general public in the two countries. The General Court dismissed their actions, which led them to lodge appeals before the Court of Justice.

The court also indicated that the EU executive had limited rights to overrule the wishes of governments.

"It is for the member states alone to determine the events which are of major importance and that the commission’s role in that respect is limited to determining whether the member states have complied with European Union law in exercising their discretion," it said.

The ruling also has implications for other sports and reduces the prospect of sports governing bodies being able to generate extra revenue by breaking up broadcasting rights packages on a pay-per-view basis.

In a statement, FIFA said that it was "disappointed" by the ruling, claiming that a requirement for free-to-air coverage "distorts the media market, negatively impacting FIFA’s ability to reach football fans with new services."

It indicated that the rules would reduce its ability to raise money from future competitions. The next competition will be held in Brazil in 2014.

For its part, UEFA warned that amateur football would suffer from the lost revenue.

The ruling "reduces the possibility to generate income that can then be distributed to the amateur game via solidarity payments," a spokesperson for UEFA said.

FIFA earned over $2 billion (€1.7 billion) from the broadcasting rights for the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, while UEFA is estimated to have made more than $1 billion (€1.3 billion) from last year's Euro-2012 tournament in Poland and Ukraine.

Football diplomacy: Euro 2012 and Ukraine

The man in charge of Ukraine's Euro 2012 football championship has said Uefa is doing more than the EU institutions to modernise the country.

Orbán's new state of emergency under fire

Hungary's premier Viktor Orbán declared a state of emergency due to the war in neighbouring Ukraine hours after pushing a constitutional amendment through parliament, where two-thirds of MPs are controlled by his Fidesz party, allowing his government special powers.

Orbán's new state of emergency under fire

Hungary's premier Viktor Orbán declared a state of emergency due to the war in neighbouring Ukraine hours after pushing a constitutional amendment through parliament, where two-thirds of MPs are controlled by his Fidesz party, allowing his government special powers.

Opinion

When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin

Neither Reagan nor Gorbachev achieved their goal at the famous Reykjavik summit of 1986. Despite that fact there are lessons that current leaders — particularly Vladimir Putin — could adopt from these two iconic leaders.

News in Brief

  1. Dutch journalists sue EU over banned Russia TV channels
  2. EU holding €23bn of Russian bank reserves
  3. Russia speeds up passport process in occupied Ukraine
  4. Palestinian civil society denounce Metsola's Israel visit
  5. Johnson refuses to resign after Downing Street parties report
  6. EU border police has over 2,000 agents deployed
  7. Dutch tax authorities to admit to institutional racism
  8. Rutte calls for EU pension and labour reforms

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic delegation visits Nordic Bridges in Canada
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersClear to proceed - green shipping corridors in the Nordic Region
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers agree on international climate commitments
  4. UNESDA - SOFT DRINKS EUROPEEfficient waste collection schemes, closed-loop recycling and access to recycled content are crucial to transition to a circular economy in Europe
  5. UiPathNo digital future for the EU without Intelligent Automation? Online briefing Link

Latest News

  1. EU summit will be 'unwavering' on arms for Ukraine
  2. Orbán's new state of emergency under fire
  3. EU parliament prevaricates on barring Russian lobbyists
  4. Ukraine lawyer enlists EU watchdog against Russian oil
  5. Right of Reply: Hungarian government
  6. When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin
  7. Orbán oil veto to deface EU summit on Ukraine
  8. France aims for EU minimum-tax deal in June

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us