Wednesday

28th Jul 2021

Opinion

Joint responsiblities in mackerel fishing

  • The changed migration pattern of the mackerel stock in the Northeast-Atlantic needs to be taken into account, says Iceland (Photo: photo_gram)

At the end of this month, a final attempt will be made to reach an agreement on the management of mackerel fishing in the Northeast-Atlantic for this year at a meeting in Bergen between the four coastal States, Iceland, the EU, Norway and the Faroe Islands.

The Icelandic authorities place great emphasis on the parties reaching an agreement in order to ensure sustainable mackerel fishing and prevent further overfishing.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

There is no disagreement among the coastal states that an agreement should be based on the advice of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) on the total allowable catch of mackerel. However, they disagree on how to allocate the quotas between themselves.

The joint proposal of the EU and Norway in this regard, submitted at the last meeting in Clonakility, Ireland, was totally unrealistic and represented a step backwards from previously quite constructive meetings. In order to reach a fair solution, the legitimate interests of all the coastal states must be taken into account.

This implies, among other issues, recognition of the changed migration pattern of the mackerel stock in the Northeast-Atlantic. The stock has in recent years migrated increasingly towards northwest and into the exclusive economic zone of Iceland.

Joint scientific research by Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands has shed light on the changed migration pattern of the mackerel stock. According to the conclusions of the surveys in 2010, around 1.1 million tonnes of mackerel, which corresponds to 23 percent of the stock, migrated into the Icelandic zone during the feeding season from May to September that year.

The results of the surveys in 2011 were almost the same in this respect, although the westward migration was even stronger. The Marine Research Institute of Iceland has estimated that mackerel grows by around 60 percent within the Icelandic zone during the summer months and the migration of the mackerel stock clearly constitutes a major interference with the Icelandic marine ecosystem, such as herring, blue whiting and other important fish stocks.

There are also indications, which must be substantiated with further research, that this big invasion of mackerel in the marine ecosystem around Iceland negatively affects the stock of small sandeel and thus plays its part in the rapid decline of seabird stocks around the island. The annual weight increase of mackerel within the Icelandic zone amounts, accordingly, to 660,000 tonnes, which constitutes more than four times the total catch of Icelandic vessels from the stock last year.

Obviously, all the parties benefit from the feeding of mackerel within the Icelandic zone and these scientific findings strengthen Iceland´s position in the negotiations. It is also clear that Iceland cannot be subjected to reduced fishing possibilities from other important fish stocks that have suffered from the mackerel migration without having a fair share in the mackerel fisheries.

In addition, there are now clear signs of mackerel being located within the Icelandic zone all year round. The Marine Research Institute has in the last two years found mackerel fry in growing quantities around the island and new year classes of mackerel are now spawning off the coast of Iceland.

The Icelandic authorities have emphasised that mackerel caught by Icelandic vessels should as far as possible be processed for human consumption in order to maximise the value of the catches. The fishing operators have invested heavily in gear and equipment for this purpose and have been very successful. More than 90 percent of mackerel caught within the Icelandic zone last year was processed for human consumption, compared to 60 percent in 2010.

Clearly this increased production and economic value have played a part in Iceland´s reconstruction after the serious economic crisis which hit the country in 2008.

The coastal states carry a joint responsibility for preventing further overfishing from the mackerel stock and ensuring suatainable fishery.

One cannot point the finger at one or two of the parties in this regard; they must all contribute to reaching an agreement. I want to assure everyone that the Icelandic authorities have the will to find a fair solution to this important issue in cooperation with the other coastal states and am convinced that all the parties will benefit more in the long term with an agreement than without one.

The writer is Iceland's Minister of Fisheries and Agriculture

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Brexit: what is the 'Lugano Convention' and does it matter?

After Brexit, the UK ceased to be a member of the Lugano Convention, an international treaty which governs cross-border civil and commercial legal disputes. In May, the European Commission published an opinion calling for the UK's re-application to be rejected.

Column

Does democracy need troublemakers?

Comedians, businessmen and other outsiders – think of Edward Snowden, Slawi Trifonow (the TV star who won the Bulgarian elections recently), or Donald Trump – try to disrupt power, pretending to expose political elites. Why is this happening?

Separating migrant families at EU borders must stop

Hundreds of documented cases of pushbacks of migrants and asylum seekers tell the story of a European Union whose member states seem to resort to increasingly degrading and inhuman practices in the management of its external borders.

Hungary: why we can't support a global minimum tax

This month the OECD Inclusive Framework agreed on the main building blocks of new tax legislation for a global minimum tax and for the digital economy. However, Hungary did not join - this is why.

Column

Does democracy need troublemakers?

Comedians, businessmen and other outsiders – think of Edward Snowden, Slawi Trifonow (the TV star who won the Bulgarian elections recently), or Donald Trump – try to disrupt power, pretending to expose political elites. Why is this happening?

Ukraine - Zelensky's authoritarian turn?

President Volodymyr Zelensky has begun his third year mired in mid-term unpopularity with a poll showing only 21.8 percent of Ukrainians would vote to re-elect him. More than half would prefer him not even to run for a second term.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council enters into formal relations with European Parliament
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen more active in violent extremist circles than first assumed
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance

Latest News

  1. EU hits vaccination target, as Delta variant now dominates
  2. European arms 'displaced over a million people', research finds
  3. Brexit: what is the 'Lugano Convention' and does it matter?
  4. US maintains summer travel ban on EU tourists
  5. Does democracy need troublemakers?
  6. Separating migrant families at EU borders must stop
  7. Germany mulls restrictions for unvaccinated as cases soar
  8. 'Prison island' birthplace of EU reborn as think-tank venue

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us