Sunday

19th Jan 2020

Opinion

When a public bank loses sight of the public interest

  • The business model of the ‘EU house bank’ and raises many questions (Photo: European Commission)

Last week an internal document was made public which revealed that the European Investment Bank (EIB) is seeking an exemption on the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT).

After speaking out against US legislation regulating over-the-counter financial derivatives trading last year, it is the second time the EIB advocates the need to be exempt from much-needed financial regulation. The incident tells us several things about the business model of the ‘EU house bank’ and raises many questions about its added value which should lie in boosting the real economy and satisfying long term finance needs in line with EU objectives.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 30-day free trial.

... or join as a group

Speculative financial flows - which outnumber investments in the productive economy by many times - have been at the core of the current financial crisis. By marginally taxing these speculative transactions the European Commission wants to disincentivise these capital flows which have the ability to destabilise our economy but don’t add anything substantially to it.

At the same time the taxes generated – which are as low as 0.1% on shares and bonds and 0.01% for derivatives – could create up to €60bn in revenues for cash-strapped governments which have taken up a lot of debt created by the financial sector e.g. by bailing out banks. This money can be invested again in the productive economy to cope with the current crisis.

The FTT proposed by the Commission has so far defied fierce lobbying from the financial sector and from countries with a big financial sector, such as the UK. Eleven EU member states (among which are France, Germany, Italy and Spain) have agreed to take the transaction tax forward. But with discussions within member states on how to implement the FTT exactly gathering more urgency, the financial sector has found a new ally in the EIB.

This is remarkable if you consider, that as a policy driven bank, the EIB’s objectives are similar to those promised by the FTT, namely boosting the productive economy and helping to satisfy the financing needs of cash-strapped governments.

Therefore an exemption on the initial issuing of financial products could be defensible as it would encourage investors to put their money in financing the EIB for the presumed good of long term counter-cyclical investment into EU economic recovery. But similar exemptions on trading public bonds on secondary markets are unacceptable as they boost speculation rather than anything else. Through the very act of seeking an exemption from the FTT, the EU Bank shows it is not merely driven by EU policies, as it usually claims, but has its own agenda to follow.

This agenda might be closely related to the €1.65bn in costs the EIB claims it would lose as a result of the transaction tax, a surprisingly high figure which suggests the EIB’s heavy involvement in financial trading.

Both the FTT and the EIB appeal to the financial markets to generate revenues but while the FTT is designed to limit speculative financial flows to a certain extent, the EIB actually expands them by getting involved in trading financial products on secondary markets. And yes, some short term trading might be justifiable to hedge the risks of long term investments. But if a transaction tax from 0.01% to 0.1% undermines the financial viability of the EIB’s investments and costs it up to €1.65bn, this goes much beyond healthy risk hedging. It is a strong indicator that the bank’s speculative activities have become predominant. The related risks could potentially undermine the EIB’s role as a long term investor for the public good.

More transparency required

To estimate the real risk to which the bank is exposed it is crucial to have an idea of the products it trades and how it hedges the risks related to its bonds and other investments. This requires more transparency from EIB management because it is putting at risk in the medium term the AAA rating of the EIB too and thus the taxpayers’ money of its shareholders, the EU member states. Detailed reporting to the Council and the European Parliament seems essential in this regard.

By deepening the financialisation of public finance, the EIB also has to abide by its logic. Following that logic, the obstacle of a marginal rise in transaction costs (which wouldn’t undermine its ability to lend below market rates as other banks face the same regulation) is deemed more important than the FTT’s underlying policy goal of boosting the economy and limiting speculative flows.

The more the EIB becomes dependent on financial markets, the more this logic will determine the banks investments and its agenda instead of public policies. The figure of €1.65bn is a good indicator of how deeply it has become involved - apparently much deeper than anybody imagined. Granting it an exemption on the FTT will only make this worse.

The writer works for Counter Balance, a European coalition of development and environmental non-governmental organisations, formed in 2007 to specifically challenge the European Investment Bank

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Why EU subsidy schemes don't work - the evidence

Counter to popular beliefs among policymakers, the positive effects of support schemes are found to be very limited. In order to revitalise Europe, the newly appointed EU Commission needs to reconsider government's role in innovation and entrepreneurship.

Can the Green Deal – and Europe – succeed?

We have invested €200bn in research and innovation since 1984, but have we achieved any leadership in quantum, semiconductors, storage, artificial intelligence? The simple answer is no.

News in Brief

  1. 'No objection in principle' on Huawei cooperation, EU says
  2. French aircraft carrier goes to Middle East amid tensions
  3. EU suggests temporary ban on facial recognition
  4. EU industry cries foul on Chinese restrictions
  5. 'Devil in detail', EU warns on US-China trade deal
  6. Trump threatened EU-tariffs over Iran, Germany confirms
  7. EU trade commissioner warns UK of 'brinkmanship'
  8. Germany strikes coal phase-out deal

Column

Why nations are egomaniacs

A nation, Reinhold Niebuhr wrote, is not capable of altruism. Even less so, if such a group has formed on the basis of strong emotions and casts itself as the "saviour of the nation".

Maltese murder - the next rule-of-law crisis in EU?

While Poland's government is escalating its rule of law crisis by introducing even more drastic measures against the country's judges, another problem is looming over the EU's commitment to upholding the rule of law: Malta.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Climate Action Weeks in December
  5. UNESDAUNESDA welcomes Nicholas Hodac as new Director General
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersBrussels welcomes Nordic culture

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAUNESDA appoints Nicholas Hodac as Director General
  2. UNESDASoft drinks industry co-signs Circular Plastics Alliance Declaration
  3. FEANIEngineers Europe Advisory Group: Building the engineers of the future
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNew programme studies infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance
  5. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  6. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us