Friday

23rd Feb 2018

Opinion

Former Israeli law chief urges EU parliament to back Palestine recognition

  • 'Were it not for this moral foundation, it is doubtful whether the Zionist idea would have taken shape at all' (Photo: Ted Eytan)

Political Zionism sought to find a solution to the persecution of Jewish people by establishing a state to renew Jewish political life.

It did not strive to establish a state within the borders of the biblical “Promised Land”, nor did it seek to reclaim control over holy sites and the tombs of the patriarchs.

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now for a 30 day free trial.

  1. €150 per year
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

It sought to actualise its national-historical affiliation with the land of Israel – not at the expense of another nation.

The state of Israel was established as Zionists realised that it is necessary to find a solution to the persecution of the Jewish people, and the international community recognised that.

International recognition of the moral justification for Israel's creation was an important and essential element in the establishment of the state. In other words, Israel was established on a clear morally recognised basis.

Were it not for this moral foundation, it is doubtful whether the Zionist idea would have taken shape at all.

The War of Independence (The 1948 Arab-Israeli War) was imposed upon us.

The Palestinian people refused to accept the partition plan defined by the UN. Thus, with the help of neighbouring Arab armies, they launched a war against Israel in an attempt to thwart the decision made by the UN General Assembly.

The war ended with Israel’s victory in 1949. At its end, Israel's borders were drawn, and our right to an independent existence in a free country was realised along with the ideals of political Zionism. These borders (Jerusalem aside) were recognised by the free and civilised world.

That was the case until the Six-Day-War of 1967.

Even if the Six-Day-War was imposed upon us (and this is a controversial assumption), the seventh day of the war - which began on 11 June 1967 and which continues to this day - was our choice.

With the excuse that we need the West Bank for security reasons, we have turned it into a colonial state.

The West Bank has remained an occupied territory for over 47 years. During this period we have ignored international treaties; expropriated land; moved Israeli settlers from Israel to the occupied territories; engaged in acts of disinheritance and theft. We have justified all these actions in the name of security.

Over the years, the motives for the occupation have merged into the following: economic exploitation of the occupied territories for the well-being of Israeli settlers and their needs.

In our eagerness to maintain control over the occupied territories, we have developed two separate legal systems: an advanced, liberal system for Israel and Israeli settlers; and a cruel, abusive system for Palestinians in the occupied territories.

In effect, we imposed an apartheid regime in the occupied territories immediately after their conquest. This oppressive regime exists to this day.

The seventh day of the Six-Day-War - which never ended - transformed us from a moral society confident in our just national revival, into an oppressive society that prevents “the other” from realising legitimate national aspirations.

For Palestinians’, resistance is a national liberation struggle.

Throughout the course of history we have learned that no nation is willing to live under foreign rule, and national liberation struggles always end in victory.

We understand this but we ignore it, prepared to engage in confrontations in order to prevent or delay the course of history. We do this knowing full well that the inevitable outcome is anchored in the moral justification for the right of all people to self-determination.

The only question that remains is, what is the bloody price that both nations will pay, up until the liberation of the Palestinian people?

In 2002, the Arab League adopted the Saudi initiative for peace between Israel and the Palestinians. As such, the Islamic non-Arab countries, adopted this peaceful initiative as well.

This initiative in essence extended an olive branch to Israel from the Palestinians and the Arab states, in order to "…see an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and establish normal relations with Israel within the framework of a comprehensive peace agreement."

This path will be about Israel’s regional integration peacefully, in turn realising the Zionist dream.

With the prolonged occupation, we are not only losing the moral basis for Israel’s existence as a free and just society, but are also seriously jeopardising chances for the state’s sustainable existence.

No security by sword alone

Israel's security cannot be based solely on the sword, but rather also on moral righteousness, peace with the Palestinian people and with neighbouring Arab states.

The regime of occupation is not only morally unjustifiable, but it also undermines Israel’s security and endangers its existence.

The Palestinian people are entitled to an independent state.

Do not expect them to accept a state that not only lacks territorial contiguity between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, but is also dismembered by Israeli settlements and foreign military outposts stuck like thorns in its side.

This will only lead to renewed military conflagrations between Israel and the Palestinians.

In this light, I praise the Swedish government’s decision to recognise the state of Palestine alongside Israel, based on the 1967 borders.

This step is not only just, but also protects the national security interests of both nations.

Furthermore, I commend the British House of Commons, the Irish Senate, and the Spanish Parliament for following suit, and I beseech the European Parliament to do the same.

Michael Ben-Yair is a former attorney general of Israel

Magazine

Over the blue horizon

A killing in the Jewish Museum in Brussels and an infant girl in the sea near Crete: fragments of two Middle East conflicts which just got worse.

News in Brief

  1. May to unveil EU departure strategy next week
  2. Pregnant workers may be dismissed, EU court rules
  3. Romanian minister demands anti-corruption prosecutor fired
  4. Luxembourg and Ireland pay highest minimum wages
  5. Freedom of expression under threat in Spain, warn MEPs
  6. Report: EU to increase sanctions on Myanmar
  7. Juncker 'worried' by Italian elections
  8. EU migration to UK at lowest since 2012

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EPSUMovie Premiere: 'Up to The Last Drop' - 22 February, Brussels
  2. Aid & Trade LondonJoin Thousands of Stakeholders of the Global Aid Industry at Aid & Trade London
  3. Macedonian Human Rights Movement Int.European Free Alliance Joins MHRMI to End the Anti-Macedonian Name Negotiations
  4. Mission of China to the EUChina-EU Tourism Year to Promote Business and Mutual Ties
  5. European Jewish CongressAt “An End to Antisemitism!” Conference, Dr. Kantor Calls for Ambitious Solutions
  6. UNESDAA Year Ago UNESDA Members Pledged to Reduce Added Sugars in Soft Drinks by 10%
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsUzbekistan: Investigate Torture of Journalist
  8. CESICESI@Noon on ‘Digitalisation & Future of Work: Social Protection For All?’ - March 7
  9. UNICEFExecutive Director's Committment to Tackling Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersState of the Nordic Region 2018: Facts, Figures and Rankings of the 74 Regions
  11. Mission of China to the EUDigital Economy Shaping China's Future, Over 30% of GDP
  12. Macedonian Human Rights Movement Int.Suing the Governments of Macedonia and Greece for Changing Macedonia's Name

Latest News

  1. EU leaders to kick off post-Brexit budget debate
  2. Greek government's steady steps to exit bailout programme
  3. Frontex: Europe's new law enforcement agency?
  4. Poland and Greece broke EU environment laws, rules court
  5. Dutch MPs vote on ending 'Ukraine-type' referendums
  6. Corruption report: Hungary gets worse, Italy makes progress
  7. UK seeks flexible transition length after Brexit
  8. Commission defence of Barroso meeting leaves 'discrepancies'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Dialogue PlatformBeyond the Errors in the War on Terror: How to Fight Global Militarism - 22 February
  2. Swedish EnterprisesHarnessing Globalization- at What Cost? Keynote Speaker Commissioner Malmström
  3. European Friends of ArmeniaSave The Date 28/02: “Nagorno-Karabakh & the EU: 1988-2018”
  4. European Heart NetworkSmart CAP is Triple Win for Economy, Environment and Health
  5. European Free AlllianceEFA Joined the Protest in Aiacciu to Solicit a Dialogue After the Elections
  6. EPSUDrinking Water Directive Step Forward but Human Right to Water Not Recognized
  7. European Gaming & Betting AssociationGambling Operators File Data Protection Complaint Against Payment Block in Norway
  8. European Jewish CongressEJC Expresses Deep Concern Over Proposed Holocaust Law in Poland
  9. CECEConstruction Industry Gets Together to Discuss the Digital Revolution @ the EU Industry Days
  10. Mission of China to the EUChina-EU Relations in the New Era
  11. European Free AlllianceEnd Discrimination of European Minorities - Sign the Minority Safepack Initiative
  12. Centre Maurits Coppieters“Diversity Shouldn’t Be Only a Slogan” Lorant Vincze (Fuen) Warns European Commission