Wednesday

1st Apr 2020

Opinion

'Consent' - the good, the bad and the ugly in e-privacy regulation

  • Rules are now tighter in the EU and beyond, businesses and public authorities are sweating to be compliant.

Trying to link a spaghetti western with digital privacy might seem as a stretch: but in Europe, we are reaching the climactic showdown of how to efficiently protect privacy online, without hampering innovation and our continent's global competitiveness.

Just two weeks ago, the EU's famous General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entered into application.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or join as a group

Rules are now tighter in the EU and beyond, businesses and public authorities are sweating to be compliant.

But GDPR is not enough for the EU legislator: a new ePrivacy Regulation is on its way and will impact the European digital economy even more.

Telecoms ministers have a choice: either they can decide to reinvent the wheel of GDPR, and fall prey to a supposed silver bullet – consent. Or they decide to go for common sense, and move the discussion in a sensible realistic direction. We are not there yet.

According to some, the silver bullet that will save our privacy is consent.

I agree that consent is important to empower citizens when their personal data are used. I need to know and agree that my personal data are processed to receive promotional offers from my favourite shop for example.

But similarly as in the famous face-off in Sergio Leone's film, what is crucial is not the plain action itself but the way in which the scene unfolds.

Consent has to resonate to be meaningful and to be valid. And it should be used where the risks for the individual are high, where the protection is most at stake. This is good.

But if consent is used for everything and excessively, it devalues consent. This is bad.

I lost count of the number of emails and messages I received in the past weeks asking me to re-consent in view of GDPR.

How many times have you actually read the entire 17,000-word privacy notice before agreeing to share your data? Do you feel more or less protected by clicking 'yes'?

Will the connected car only drive if the owner is constantly pressing buttons on their dashboard to consent to various data-based operations, like communicating with the road infrastructure or the car ahead?

In the EU, we aimed at creating a true culture and awareness of privacy protection through the GDPR. It will protect citizens from data scandals like the recent Facebook/Cambridge Analytica case – ePrivacy is not relevant here as we have all the protection and sanction tools we need with GDPR.

Proper enforcement of existing rules is needed – not always new laws. GDPR is an important step forward, it is being copied world-wide and is a real improvement for EU citizens and companies.

We should be proud of that achievement even if I would have wished for less constraints on our economic actors.

The GDPR insists on the fact that consent is only one way of protecting an individual's data. It recognises that it is not appropriate in all situations. Yet in the currently negotiated ePrivacy Regulation, we risk undermining that pragmatic approach. This is ugly.

Where the GDPR puts consent in a broader context tied to a risk-assessment, the new ePrivacy Regulation elevates consent into an "all or nothing" approach. This is all the more surprising as EU regulators seemed to have recognised that clicking endless cookie-banners online does not lead to more privacy.

Cost/benefit analysis

Instead we should orient the ePrivacy Regulation along the real question: what is the true risk or potential harm for the individual when using innovative services?

The GDPR gives us many tools that should be part of ePrivacy, as they sit more comfortably with new technologies: concepts such as transparency, data sovereignty, opt-out solutions, right to object and innovative privacy-protective measures like pseudonymisation or encryption. These ensure that companies are held accountable – together with the fines – depending on the data-intensity of their business operations.

Let's focus again on the assessment of the risks and potential harms: this is what we want to prevent. Consent can be a silver bullet – so let's not overshoot but use it wisely.

EU ministers in Council have a chance to make the text future-proof.

I call on them to ensure we are not deceiving our citizens and stakeholders. We are dishonest if we promise our citizens that consent always gives them control over their personal data and their privacy.

If badly implemented – as seen in the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica case - it does the opposite: consent leaves little for the individual to remedy. As a user, I have effectively given away my control rather than to retain it.

It can become a boomerang bullet.

Axel Voss is a German MEP with the CDU, part of the European People's Party

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

GDPR - a global 'gold standard'?

The new EU privacy rules are touted as a global 'gold standard' - but Mexico's former data commissioner warns some nations are far from ready.

New GDPR enforcer says complaints imminent

The European Data Protection Board is a new EU body tasked with enforcing the EU's privacy laws with powers to impose massive fines. Its head Andrea Jelinek told reporters complaints against companies are expected to be immediate.

Analysis

GDPR does not (yet) give right to global oblivion

The 'right to be forgotten' will become enshrined in EU law on Friday, but it is not yet clear to what extent it will apply. Will the EU's law determine how the internet looks globally?

Are EU data watchdogs staffed for GDPR?

The success of the new general data protection regulation (GDPR) will depend on whether data protection authorities enforce the new rules - which, in turn, will be at least partly determined by how many people they employ.

Column / Brussels Bytes

The EU cannot shape the future of AI with regulation

If the EU continues to over-regulate AI, its AI systems will fail to compete on a global scale and the technology's long-term future, for better or worse, will be shaped by the United States and China.

Will US privacy-lite hollow out GDPR?

Some say GDPR is the most developed data protection law in the world, but the US has opted for a very different approach - a "voluntary tool" based on privacy risk management.

News in Brief

  1. Danish conservatives want Orban party kicked out of EPP
  2. Dutch finance minister repents on virus help
  3. France to house domestic violence victims in hotels
  4. Europe sends medical goods to Iran, despite US embargo
  5. Commission sets consultation on raising 2030 climate target
  6. 12-year old Belgian girl dies of coronavirus
  7. EU commission: no 'indefinite' emergency measures
  8. Denmark plans 'gradual' return to normal after Easter

Column

Only democracy can fight epidemics

As Li Wenliang, the deceased Chinese doctor who was reprimanded for reporting on the virus, said: "There should be more openness and transparency".

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. Without European patriotism, EU decline is inevitable
  2. EU cancels April Fool's 'fake news'
  3. A coronavirus 'Marshall Plan' alone won't be nearly enough
  4. Trying to think straight about coronavirus
  5. Berlin ready to airlift Greek island refugees
  6. Von der Leyen criticises Hungary, but fails to mention it
  7. Air pollution drops in Europe, but how long will it last?
  8. Human rights abusers don't stop for virus, MEPs tell EU

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us