Friday

30th Sep 2022

Column

Is it goodbye to 'pacifist' Germany?

Listen to article

German foreign policy thinking changed dramatically on 24 February 2022, but where is it headed?

For a long time, observers complained about a lack of geo-strategic thinking in the German political class, demonstrated most clearly in its underestimation of the Russian military threat and an ever-growing dependency on energy resources from Putin's militaristic authoritarian regime.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Let's hope than that the current crisis will result in the development of a German foreign policy that is less naïve and possesses a clear understanding of military threats and how authoritarian regimes operate

Key decisions of the last decades were based on premises, now revealed to have been naïve at best.

How will Germany change in the face of this debacle? Contrary to perceptions, the country has not really been a pacifist power. It is well integrated in Nato, deploys forces on missions abroad, is the fourth-largest arms exporter in the world and the seventh biggest spender on the military.

Yet, many Germans saw the country as a benign power that will always favours diplomacy and peace-making over the use of force.

For most Germans the army had become a distant institution, especially since the abolition of military service in 2011. Soldiers were viewed as akin to toilet cleaners, doing a necessary job about which you would not want to talk too much.

Discussion about geo-strategy and military matters has been largely absent from political life and hardly figured in policy or think tank debates.

And the pacifist attitude has not gone away, shown recently when a group of influential writers created much controversy with open letters demanding that the government stops supporting Ukraine's army and instead focuses on diplomatic efforts.

Their arguments displayed many of the lazy assumptions and clichés of German public discourse over the years. They described diplomacy as the alternative to military power, as if the two had no connection to each other. Why would the Kremlin ever negotiate if the Ukrainian army was weak?

While such naivety is likely to fade away, its effects partly explain why Germany has not led European support to Ukraine's military efforts.

So how are German attitudes about military power and foreign policy likely to shape up?

Some parties, like the right-wing extremists of Alternative for Germany [AfD], promote an unabashed egoistic, short-term-oriented foreign policy, arguing that it is not worth turning down the heating in winter "just to help Ukraine".

This position at least has the advantage of being honest. It does not pretend that hard choices can be avoided by some miracle of German diplomacy and peacemaking, it just wants to make those choices in favour of Russia.

Two schools-of-thought

Beyond such minority opinions, the question is how wider foreign policy thinking may shape up. Here two schools of thoughts can be discerned.

The first, turning to hyper-realism, goes like this: the Russian attack shows that foreign policy is ultimately always about coercive power, primarily military power and sometimes economic power. Everything else, work on peacemaking, supporting democracy, or human rights is just the feel-good part of foreign policy.

Nice to do, but ultimately a luxury that does not affect serious change.

The opposition leader, Friedrich Merz of the Christian Democratic Union [CDU], hinted at this in a recent parliamentary debate, claiming that increased military spending should under no circumstances benefit ideas like a feminist foreign policy — dismissing a stated government policy as undeserving of serious investment in security.

Foreign minister Annalena Baerbock, from the Green party, responded that the mass rape of women in war had for too long been ignored as a security issue and in international; an omission that would be corrected by a feminist foreign approach (in fairness: Merz later agreed that a feminist perspective on war was important).

Responding in this way, Baerbock expressed the second school of thought that does not limit foreign policy debate to traditional issues like military or economic power and demonstrates a more realistic view of the world, which takes into account how governments deal with their own and other people.

Experts dealing with human rights and democracy in foreign relations have seen for a long time that the Kremlin was on a dangerous, authoritarian path.

From the beginning of his presidency, when he brutally crushed the Chechen uprising, they had a clearer understanding of Putin than many self-styled "realists".

The EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen displays similar naivety now, when she calls Azerbaijan a trustworthy energy supplier.

Increasing gas imports from Azerbaijan makes sense in order to diversify away from Russia. But the country is governed by an authoritarian regime which will not hesitate to use gas as a pressure, for example to exact favourable EU positions in its conflict with Armenia.

Let's hope than that the current crisis will result in the development of a German foreign policy that is less naïve and possesses a clear understanding of military threats and how authoritarian regimes operate.

The challenges ahead are huge and debate has barely begun on how to balance the many interests and needs of German foreign policy.

These include keeping the EU together and intact, becoming a leader in European security, engaging globally on climate policy and pushing back authoritarian tendencies around the world.

The refocusing of German foreign policy is happening in the pressure cooker of a series of multiple crises. Let's hope this reality check will make it stronger, sharper and more clear eyed about the dangers of the world.

Author bio

Michael Meyer-Resende is the executive director of Democracy Reporting International, a non-partisan NGO in Berlin that supports political participation.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

The moral cost of 'social peace' in Germany

Germany remains the main obstacle to European sanctions on the Russian oil & gas industry. When will the Zeitenwende ['turning point' in German energy policy] finally deliver?

Music, martial arts, and extremism in Germany

Right-wing music festivals and mixed martial arts events have become key venues for funding extremism. A plan from Germany's interior minister Nancy Faeser can help tackle that.

How US tech giants play EU states off against each other

Some have tried to justify Big Tech's meagre tax payments in EU states with heavier tax burdens by emphasising the fact that these companies create jobs and invest in next-generation technologies. However, their market dominance comes at a steep cost.

Column

EU should admonish less, and listen more, to the Global South

Whether on Russia, or gas, or climate change, or food security, the EU's constant finger-wagging and moralising is becoming unbearably repetitive and self-defeating. Most countries in the Global South view it as eurocentric and neo-colonial.

News in Brief

  1. EU ministers adopt measures to tackle soaring energy bills
  2. EU takes Malta to court over golden passports
  3. EU to ban Russian products worth €7bn a year more
  4. Denmark: CIA did not warn of Nord Stream attack
  5. Drone sightings in the North Sea 'occurred over months'
  6. Gazprom threatens to cut gas deliveries to Europe via Ukraine
  7. New compromise over EU energy emergency measures
  8. 15 states push for EU-wide gas price cap

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. The European Association for Storage of EnergyRegister for the Energy Storage Global Conference, held in Brussels on 11-13 Oct.
  2. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  3. European Committee of the RegionsThe 20th edition of EURegionsWeek is ready to take off. Save your spot in Brussels.
  4. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries

Latest News

  1. Going Down Under — EU needs to finish trade deal with Australia
  2. MEPs worry Russian disinfo weakens support for Ukraine
  3. Everything you need to know about the EU gas price cap plan
  4. Why northeast Italy traded in League for Brothers of Italy
  5. How US tech giants play EU states off against each other
  6. Deregulation of new GMO crops: science or business?
  7. The European shipping giants plying Putin's fossil-fuels trade
  8. Russian ideologue and caviar on latest EU blacklist

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us