Thursday

30th Mar 2023

Opinion

Creeping civil society curbs threaten rights in Europe in 2023

  • The idea that a state can legitimately interfere with civil society groups simply because it doesn't like what they are working on or what they have to say has troubling implications for the health of democracy (Photo: Andres Musta)
Listen to article

Civil society organisations, including groups that work to protect human rights, are under growing threat in Europe itself.

The threat these days doesn't come just from repressive governments like those in Russia or Turkey. Nor it is even confined to democratic states on the road to authoritarianism like Hungary and Poland.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

It now also comes from elected governments in states whose democracies appear in better health, such as France, Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

European democracies used to respect civil society's independence and recognise the value of their work, even if those groups said and did things that the government didn't like.

Now we see efforts to restrict civil society space, with government ministers and officials openly criticising the work of these groups.

Governments have imposed legal restrictions, including in some cases on the use of foreign funding. Officials use the criminal justice system to prosecute and intimidate activists. Regulators curb or threaten groups, and governments and ruling parties try to influence the activities of publicly funded organisations through funding or board membership.

The idea that a state can legitimately interfere with civil society groups simply because it doesn't like what they are working on or what they have to say has troubling implications for the health of democracy and the protection of human rights.

Civil society organisations exercise a critical function in a democratic society as a check on executive power. Curbs on their work undermine that function, and thereby fray the democratic fabric.

In France, state efforts to define the place of Islam and Muslims in society under president Emmanuel Macron's government have extended to curbs on groups that speak out against those efforts, including bans by government decrees and asset freezes, notably against the anti-discrimination organisation Collective Against Islamophobia in France, known by its French abbreviation CCIF.

The government of France put pressure on the European Commission to cut funding to French and other organisations for speaking out against French government policy.

The government used the criminal justice system against people showing solidarity with irregular migrants until appeal courts stepped in. It passed a law requiring organisations in France to sign up to an ill-defined loyalty contract, including to receive public funding.

In the UK, ministers and other members of the ruling Conservative party have put pressure on groups through public criticism and via the main regulator of groups that have charitable tax-exempt status. When the head of a children's charity wrote a blog about racism, for example, it triggered complaints to the regulator by ruling party MPs.

Similar complaints were made about groups exposing Britain's history of colonialism and government failings on racism. And a proposed new law would deepen already onerous restrictions on the ability of groups to protest.

In Greece, under the New Democracy government, the criminal justice system has been used to threaten civil society groups and activists especially those working on migration issues. New registration requirements have imposed an unreasonable burden on groups. All of this has prompted criticism from the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights defenders.

Civil society groups working with migrants in Italy, carrying out search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean, and reporting on migration cooperation with Libya have faced similar pressures, including smears, surveillance including unauthorised wiretapping, and prosecution.

The most recent EU rule of law report makes recommendations on civil society space (as a proxy for expressing concern) to Greece, France, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, Ireland, Germany, and Latvia.

Frontline Defenders, which works to support human rights defenders and groups under threat around the world has worked on cases in nine EU member states, including Spain, France, Greece and Italy.

Practically speaking, impeding the work of NGOs leaves them less able to respond to the needs and protect the rights and interests of those on whose behalf they work. Internationally, it normalises the idea that executive interference with the legitimate work of civil society is acceptable, undermining efforts by EU and other European governments to promote space for civil society groups in other parts of the world.

What can be done to reverse the trend? It's vital for legislators to speak out about executive interference and why it matters even for the work of groups they don't like.

There is an important role for regional and international bodies and courts, like the Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights and UN bodies like the UN expert on human rights defenders.

The European Commission and EU Court of Justice, both of which have already shown some willingness to act, could do more to uphold the rights of civil society. Solidarity is also important: while large international groups are less likely to be targeted, they can help preserve space for others.

The ability of independent groups to work freely is a measure of the health of our democracies. We ignore these curbs at our peril.

Author bio

Benjamin Ward is deputy Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Italy's criminalisation of migrant rescue: the luventa case

Italy's new government has launched a fresh assault on non-governmental rescue groups that save lives. While the rhetoric is sharper and some tactics are new, successive Italian governments have tried to block maritime rescue groups — including with criminal charges.

No Tories are now defending Brexit — and Truss is noticing

The mood in London in ruling political, financial, and opinion-forming circles is that the steam is going out of the Brexit balloon. Brexit is now seen as a bore, replete with negatives for economic, scientific and civil society.

Magazine

Digital EU: the Good, the Bad — and the Ugly

The European Union has impressive digital ambitions and an equally-impressive array of initiatives, proposals, directives and regulations, all designed to make the bloc 'fit for the digital age'. But what do they all mean — and will they all work?

The overlooked 'crimes against children' ICC arrest warrant

An unprecedented component of this announcement has received less attention: the ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Putin's commissioner for children's rights. Lvova-Belova is accused of deporting and unlawful transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia.

Column

What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking

Perhaps even more surprising to the West was the fact that the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal was not brokered by the United States, or the European Union, but by the People's Republic of China. Since when was China mediating peace agreements?

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Latest News

  1. The overlooked 'crimes against children' ICC arrest warrant
  2. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  3. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  4. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  5. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  6. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  7. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  8. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us