Monday

25th Sep 2023

Opinion

Bulgaria's never-ending doom loop of elections

  • After five elections in just two years, Bulgarian voters' confidence in political parties has exponentially shrunken (Photo: dimnikolov)
Listen to article

At the beginning of April, Bulgaria will be holding its fifth parliamentary elections in less than two years. Not even Israel with the same number of elections, but in four years, or Spain with four in four years come close to the frequency with which Bulgarians are called to the polls.

The closest European precedent took place more than 100 years ago, when Denmark held three parliamentary elections in less than five months.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

How did Bulgaria manage to get here — and what does it mean for the functioning of democracy in the country?

The first (regular) parliamentary elections in April 2021 were won by the then incumbent party, Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB), in coalition with the traditionally anti-communist Union of Democratic Forces (SDS).

Given the opposition of all parliamentary parties to cooperate with GERB, due to the polarising character of its leader, Boyko Borissov, a government could not be formed and new early parliamentary elections took place in July that very same year. This was clear evidence that from that moment party competition would be determined by parties' attitudes towards the ruling GERB.

These were won by a completely new political party (the populist There is Such a People,ITN), otherwise a constant characteristic of the Bulgarian party system. By insisting on ruling alone, ITN also failed to form a government.

Victory in the next parliamentary elections held — together with the ones for president — in November 2021 went to another formation party, We Continue the Change (PP), formed just less than two months before the elections by two popular ministers in charge of economy (Kiril Petrov) and finance (Asen Vasilev) in the previous caretaker government.

They did manage to form a government after just a month, but the coalition, which brought together PP, the Bulgarian Socialist Party, the populist ITN and the alliance called Democratic Bulgaria, was so ideologically heterogeneous that collapsed in the first successful vote of no confidence in Bulgarian history less than eight months later.

As a result, a fourth parliamentary election was scheduled for October 2022.

The outcome did not differ much from all the preceding electoral contests. Like in April the year before, the GERB-SDS electoral coalition won, but none of the political camps got enough seats to put together a parliamentary majority. This time not even a technocratic government was appealing enough to motivate them to cooperate.

Close, but not cigar: Bulgaria's uncertain democratic future

Parties are not the only losers in the current situation, citizens are too. Confidence in political parties has exponentially shrunken.

In a report published at the end of September, citizens' distrust towards political parties went above 80 percent. This has certainly reflected in parties' capability to represent voters and mobilise them.

As a result, during the last October parliamentary elections voter turnout hit rock bottom with just 39 percent of voters going to the polls, the lowest since the first free-and-fair elections in June 1990. And this promises to be a constant also in the forthcoming elections where the projected turnout is as low as 40.7 percent.

Recent changes in the electoral rules regarding the way citizens will cast their votes (e.g. exclusive use of machines or also paper ballot) and how the votes will be counted (e.g. paper and machine votes together or separated) are expected to bring further alienation as well as increase citizens' distrust in the process, on top of putting into question the legitimacy of the political system as a whole.

Citizens are starting to see elections as a means for politicians to take power and divide it up among themselves. As shown in a recent documentary on national TV, the current situation is as "uncertain, unfair and difficult to predict" as it "has never been", making voters wonder if this "will [really] be the last vote".

Paradoxically, Bulgarians predominantly still believe that democracy is the best form of government. This does not mean that if parties continue to prioritize their interests over the general good things might quickly change.

In the same documentary one interviewee stated: "it was not so bad even during the time of Todor Zhivkov [Bulgaria's 35-years long communist dictator]".

ITN's petition for a referendum to introduce a presidential regime (Turkish style) is another sign of a dangerous tendency: the nostalgia towards strongman rule.

Contrary to what political scientists have traditionally maintained, in Bulgaria parties are not inevitably linked to representative democracy: they hate parties, but like democracy. How long the current state of affairs will last might be only a matter of time.

Author bio

Teodora Yovcheva teaches at the University of Sofia. Fernando Casal Bertoa teaches at the University of Nottingham.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Analysis

What's behind the sudden political unrest in Bulgaria?

Demonstrators are demanding prime minister Boyko Borissov and chief prosecutor Ivan Geshev resign, following a raid on the president's office. President Rumen Radev has been a vocal critic of the government and its record on graft.

Hurdles remain for Schengen hopefuls Bulgaria and Romania

The European Commission is mounting pressure for Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia to join passport free Schengen area. On Wednesday (16 November), it presented a 13-page document explaining why they should become part of the zone next January.

Shelving Bulgaria and Romania's Schengen dream helps Russia

Bulgaria and Romania's accession to Schengen will again be put to a vote later this year. Another veto would not only represent a missed opportunity to strengthen the border-free zone, but one that could inflame inter-EU tensions.

Latest News

  1. EU trade chief in Beijing warns China of only 'two paths' forward
  2. Why should taxpayers pay for private fishing fleets in third countries?
  3. Women at risk from shoddy EU laws on domestic workers
  4. EU poised to agree on weakened emission rules
  5. China trade tension and migration deal This WEEK
  6. Europe's energy strategy: A tale of competing priorities
  7. Why Greek state workers are protesting new labour law
  8. Gloves off, as Polish ruling party fights for power

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators, industry & healthcare experts at the 24th IMDRF session, September 25-26, Berlin. Register by 20 Sept to join in person or online.
  2. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  3. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA
  4. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators & industry experts at the 24th IMDRF session- Berlin September 25-26. Register early for discounted hotel rates
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersGlobal interest in the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations – here are the speakers for the launch
  6. Nordic Council of Ministers20 June: Launch of the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us