Sunday

28th May 2023

Column

A new way of looking at 'power' in Europe

Listen to article

It is often said that the European Union has become more powerful in recent years. And that, therefore, its member states have lost power. But while the former is true, the latter is not.

Certainly, we have 'more Europe' now than before: for example, we have established European banking supervision, a eurozone rescue fund, a European minimum wage directive and the world's most ambitious climate targets.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • The system is as strong as its weakest link — one Hungary can perhaps be managed, but several cannot

The EU has also procured vaccines for all its citizens, it funds arms deliveries to Ukraine and, thanks to common debt issuance, it is massively funding 'Next Generation EU' projects to help national economies recover from the pandemic. All these things — and more — were unthinkable just 10 or 15 years ago.

Look more closely, and you will see that it is not unelected officials in Brussels who have taken those steps, but national leaders. This shows that member states have not become less powerful — quite the contrary, in fact. It is national leaders who are the decision makers in Europe.

Moreover, in a marked contrast to past practice, they do not step back anymore to let the European Commission run the implementation phase, but stay involved by checking vaccine contracts and evaluating each other's recovery projects, for example. More than ever, national capitals are calling the shots in Brussels. In short, the European Commission and the member states have both gained power in recent years. The power of the one does not come at the expense of the other.

Outside observers often have difficulty understanding this. After all, the EU cannot be compared to a classical nation state with a strong government, a deep public purse and robust coercive power. Still, the EU has greater capacity than any of the international organisations in the global governance system.

Since it does not fit into any known category, the media and political observers tend to focus on what it cannot do, instead of what it can do. Every crisis in the EU is considered "existential" and every European summit meeting "make or break".

This is why the Irish political scientist Brigid Laffan, a former professor at the European University Institute in Florence, proposes to start thinking differently about 'power' in Europe. In a fascinating new study, drawing on existing literature in political science and partly building on lectures she delivered earlier, she writes that when it comes to modern Europe, we need to distinguish between two types of power: the 'power over' and the 'power to'.

When you have power over others, there is always an element of coercion in it, of hierarchy and inequality and sometimes force and violence — for example, 'power over' is what Russia wants to have over Ukraine. The second variant, 'power to', is a different kind of power: the power to act and to do certain things. This, says Laffan, is the kind of power we are dealing with in Europe, with 27 countries voluntarily sitting together (no one has forced them to join) to do things together they do not manage to do alone.

This shared power began with 'technical tools' like the single market. Using it, the EU became a global superpower. Companies all over the world companies must comply with strict European rules and standards if they want to enter the European single market. So, these rules and standards are adhered to in many parts of the globe.

Anu Bradford, a Finnish-American Columbia Law School professor, brilliantly described this mechanism in her book The Brussels Effect.

Some Europeans long back to the good old days, when 'we were just a market'. But mere normative power is no longer an option in today's world, dominated by raw geopolitical power games. Europe must respond to this, if only to protect itself. It has therefore increasingly begun to develop its political power, to be able to hold its own.

This has not happened by building an all-powerful superstate, but in the typical European way: with member states deciding piecemeal, with every crisis, to devise common solutions to new problems they are not able to solve on their own.

Brexit, Covid, Ukraine

Together with European institutions, they devise concrete solutions and decide what is needed and who will implement it. This is a fluid process, with many different actors. Laffan studied it based on three case-studies: Brexit, the pandemic and the war in Ukraine.

In her observation, member states are indeed the undisputed centre of power in Europe. National leaders set the direction. They decide what the 'narrative' will be, and whether existing instruments are sufficient or new ones are needed.

With Brexit, there was no need at all for new instruments: unity among the 27 was the main instrument, and all it took to maintain this were frequent consultations between Brussels and EU capitals. With the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, however, member states did decide to mobilise a mix of existing and new instruments. Increasingly, the European budget is being used.

In this way, Laffan writes, the EU is becoming a kind of collective service provider — supplying member states and citizens not just with rules but with vaccines, energy, border guards or investments at the request of member states. National leaders want to strengthen that function, for the simple reason that they benefit from it.

The strength of this system which she calls 'collective power Europe', based on power-sharing, is that member states partly run it themselves and therefore feel ownership. Its weakness, of course, is a constant lack of resources and power.

Moreover, each and every member state must be constructive and cooperative for it to function. The system is as strong as its weakest link — one Hungary can perhaps be managed, but several cannot.

But whatever its many flaws, the EU is what it is: a unique form of power-sharing in constant transformation, which should be judged accordingly. A focus on its capacity to act rightly, and finally, draws attention to what it can do instead of what it cannot do.

Author bio

Caroline de Gruyter is a Europe correspondent and columnist for the Dutch newspaper NRC. She is also a columnist for Foreign Policy and De Standaard. This piece is adapted from a column in NRC.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column

Member states are taking more control — for better or worse?

Two major trends — more Europe and a more intergovernmental Europe — should get alarm bells ringing. The European Union risks becoming a bazaar dominated by national politicians haggling, doing handshakes, walking out and having tantrums.

Column

Why Europe's interminable compromises are a virtue

All member states complain about European compromises, each for their own reasons. Nevertheless, these decisions tend to be robust precisely because there is enough in them for everybody. And nobody wants to start negotiating all over again for another deal.

How one pioneering Italian woman transformed EU law

The story of how Wilma Viscardini, a young female lawyer in a town in northern Italy in the 1950s, pioneered using new, liberal European legislation on issues like the free movement of workers or consumer rights, to help citizens.

Column

Why it's harder than ever to chase autocrats from power

Modern dictators wear suits instead of uniforms. They hold referendums and opinion polls, and chat with citizens. This democratic façade allows them to mingle with the Davos crowd, keep foreign investors onboard, and, crucially, deliver economic growth for their citizens.

Column

What a Spanish novelist can teach us about communality

In a world where cultural clashes and sectarianism seems to be on the increase, Spanish novelist Javier Cercas (b.1962) takes the opposite approach. He cherishes both life in the big city and in the countryside.

How the EU's money for waste went to waste in Lebanon

The EU led support for the waste management crisis in Lebanon, spending around €89m between 2004-2017, with at least €30m spent on 16 solid-waste management facilities. However, it failed to deliver.

The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it

The EU's ambition to be a digital superpower stands in stark contrast to the US — but the bigger problem is that it remains far better at regulation than innovation, despite decades of hand-wringing over Europe's technology gap.

EU export credits insure decades of fossil-fuel in Mozambique

European governments are phasing out fossil fuels at home, but continuing their financial support for fossil mega-projects abroad. This is despite the EU agreeing last year to decarbonise export credits — insurance on risky non-EU projects provided with public money.

Latest News

  1. How the EU's money for waste went to waste in Lebanon
  2. EU criminal complicity in Libya needs recognition, says expert
  3. Europe's missing mails
  4. MEPs to urge block on Hungary taking EU presidency in 2024
  5. PFAS 'forever chemicals' cost society €16 trillion a year
  6. EU will 'react as appropriate' to Russian nukes in Belarus
  7. The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it
  8. EU: national energy price-spike measures should end this year

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us