Tuesday

19th Sep 2017

Analysis

Parliament bares teeth on ECB

  • MEPs are now much more assertive towards the Frankfurt-based bank (Photo: Valentina Pop)

Prior to the 2009 elections the European Central Bank (ECB) did not take the European Parliament very seriously. In its defence, it did not need to.

The bank's function was just to control price stability through interest rates and - with the first decade of its existence coinciding with a period of prolonged and consistent economic growth - there were relatively few challenges to its work.

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now and get 40% off for an annual subscription. Sale ends soon.

  1. €90 per year. Use discount code EUOBS40%
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

Scrutiny of the ECB was also fairly tame. Compared to the powers that the US Congress has over the Federal Reserve or the UK House of Commons over the Bank of England, scrutiny at European level was palpably weak.

The accountability of the bank to the parliament consisted of one non-binding report per year responding to the ECB's own annual report, with MEPs giving their verdict on the bank's performance and making a handful of modest demands.

Meanwhile, the President of the ECB would appear before the economic committee every three months for a "monetary dialogue" which consisted of a presentation followed by questions from MEPs.

A tough examination with probing and hostile questioning it was not. One contact at the bank once remarked that she was surprised at how reverentially MEPs treated former Presidents Duisberg and Trichet.

Crisis dynamics

The financial and sovereign debt crises have changed things, however.

In 2008 and 2009 the bank started to pour almost limitless amounts of cheap money into the eurozone's ailing banking system, with its Fixed Rate Full Allotment scheme and long-term refinancing operations guaranteeing a liquidity fix for all banks which need it.

Over four years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the ECB is still providing economic life-support to private banks.

It then switched its attention to sovereign debt, starting with Greek paper, and bought huge quantities of government bonds.

At the same time, the so-called Jacques de Larosiere report - a blueprint on EU financial supervision drafted by a former top official in the International Monetray Fund - set in motion plans for creating new EU agencies on banking, securities, markets, insurance and pensions and a new systemic risk board (ESRB) run by the ECB to act as an overall "watchdog."

With such an activist role, it is both right and politically essential that the ECB can be held to account.

The ECB, anxious to get started with the ESRB as soon as possible, started lobbying MEPs with the aim of getting the legislative process to speed up.

But parliament has started to become more assertive. ECB officials were furious in January 2010 when MEPs on the economic committee announced that it would summon all new appointees to the bank's executive to pre-appointment hearings, a practice previously reserved solely for the ECB's president-elect.

But if the central bank's top-brass were irritated by this, they could be in for some further annoyance.

This week the parliament may oppose the appointment of Luxembourg's central bank governor, Yves Mersch, to the ECB board regardless of how well he performs before the economic committee on Monday (22 October), on the grounds that there are no women at the ECB's top table.

It would be the first time MEPs have rejected a nominee to the bank.

The Mersch saga has been rumbling on for a few months. The parliament's first shot across the bows came in May when Sharon Bowles, the committee's UK Liberal chairperson, wrote to Eurogroup chair Jean-Claude Juncker urging him to present ministers with male and female candidates to replace Spain's Jose Manuel Gonzalez Paramo.

The letter, which was agreed unanimously by political groups, also called on ministers to promote women to the top posts in the ECB as well as national central banks and ministries.

However, MEPs were rebuffed. In July, Mersch was approved by eurozone finance ministers for the post which, if he serves the standard eight year term, means that the ECB's six-person executive board will remain a men-only club until 2018.

Under the treaties the parliament has to be "consulted" before ECB executive board members can be appointed, but it has no formal veto powers.

Officials connected to the Eurogroup have indicated that Mersch will be appointed despite parliament's opposition. That said, ministers will be reluctant to defy Parliament since refusing to endorse a candidate sends out a hostile political statement.

It is a tactic that the parliament has used repeatedly over the past 50 years, whether over legislation or appointments, to gradually assert its legitimacy and to increase its powers in EU decision making.

For instance, MEPs have been demanding that the ECB publish the minutes of meetings of its governing board for years.

The bank has always flatly rejected this, insisting that publishing what its members say and how they vote would undermine market confidence in its decision-making process. But in September, ECB President Mario Draghi indicated that he had an "open mind" on the issue, as close to a u-turn as a central banker can go.

A portent of things to come

Taken in the context of ongoing bank union proposals which will establish the ECB as the supervisor of the eurozone's banking sector, parliament's show of strength is a portent of things to come.

Many MEPs were bemused by the banking union package, angry that the commission proposal to expand the ECB's remit will be decided solely by ministers.

The two MEPs chosen to lead parliament's negotiations on the deal - Dutch centre-right deputy Marianne Thyssen and German green Sven Giegold - have made it clear that they will treat the two files as though MEPs have an equal say on both. MEPs are likely to demand regular hearings with the ECB's supervisory arm as well as democratic control over its senior members.

Parliament asserting its right to keep the ECB - and finance ministers - honest is a healthy development.

The ECB has assumed a major role in the EU's crisis management response to first the banking crisis and then the sovereign debt crisis, and will become a financial authority second only to the US Federal Reserve in terms of power if, as expected, it becomes the single supervisor of the eurozone's banks.

Establishing the ECB at the centre of a banking union makes closer parliamentary scrutiny essential if the banking union is to command the legitimacy it needs.

In practice, this will probably mean that the ECB will relax its attitude on some previously sacrosanct matters.

Though often derided as a "talking shop," parliament has a strong track record as a chamber demanding more control over EU decision-making and the decision-makers themselves. The ECB would be well-advised to make parliament a friend rather than a foe.

EU countries cool on Juncker's ideas

There was not much enthusiasm voiced in EU countries after Juncker unveiled his grand ideas about a single EU president and a larger eurozone. Dutch PM Rutte suggested seeing an eye doctor.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EU2017EEFour Tax Initiatives to Modernise the EU's Tax System
  2. Dialogue PlatformResponsibility in Practice: Gulen & Islamic Thought
  3. Counter BalanceHuman Rights Concerns Over EIB Loan to the Trans Anatolian Pipeline Project
  4. Mission of China to the EUChina Leads the Global Clean Energy Transition
  5. CES - Silicones EuropeFrom Baking Moulds to Oven Mitts, Silicones Are a Key Ingredient in Kitchens
  6. Martens CentreFor a New Europeanism: How to Put the Motto "Unity in Diversity" Into Practice
  7. Access MBAGet Ahead With an MBA Degree. Top MBA Event in Brussels
  8. Idealist QuarterlyIdealist Quarterly Event: Building Fearless Democracies With Gerald Hensel
  9. Mission of China to the EUPresident Xi Urges Bigger Global Role for Emerging Economies
  10. EU2017EEAre We Socially Insured in the Future of Work?
  11. European Jewish CongressFrench Authorities to Root Out "Societal Antisemitism" After Jewish Family Assaulted
  12. European Federation of Local Energy CompaniesClean Energy for All? On 10.10 Top-Level Speakers Present the Clean Energy Package

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFUp to Three Quarters of Children Face Abuse & Exploitation on Mediterranean Migration Routes
  2. Swedish EnterprisesEurope Under Challenge; Recipe for a Competitive EU
  3. European Public Health AllianceCall to International Action to Break Deadlock on Chronic Diseases Crisis
  4. CES - Silicones EuropePropelling the construction revolution with silicones
  5. EU2017EEEU 2018 Budget: A Case of Three Paradoxes
  6. ACCAUS 'Dash for Gas' Could Disrupt Global Gas Markets
  7. Swedish Enterprises“No Time to Lose” Film & Debate on How Business & Politics Can Fight Climate Change
  8. European Free AllianceSave The Date!! 26.09 - Coppieters Awards To... Carme Forcadell
  9. European Jewish CongressEJC Expresses Grave Concern Over Rise in Antisemitism in Poland
  10. EU2017EECybersecurity and the Estonian Presidency
  11. European Free AllianceFemu a Corsica. A Corsican Nationalist Party With a European Dimension
  12. Salzburg Global SeminarSeminar on Sharing Experiences Across Borders to Combat Extremism