EU promises to respect Western Sahara trade ruling
-
EU commission says the December 2016 EU court ruling on the Western Sahara will be respected (Photo: Mark Fisher)
The European Commission is seeking a trade deal with Morocco but some MEPs say a draft appears to ignore a European Court of Justice ruling on the disputed territory of Western Sahara.
However, a commission spokesperson on Monday (5 February) said they are sticking to the judgement and that any final deal will follow the court's ruling on the territory.
Join EUobserver today
Become an expert on Europe
Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.
Choose your plan
... or subscribe as a group
Already a member?
"The starting point is the respect of the court judgement and the goal is to clarify the status of products from Western Sahara," the spokesperson said, in an email.
The Western Sahara is a disputed territory annexed by Morocco in the late 1970s. A shaky ceasefire between the Polisario independence movement and Morocco was signed in 1991.
The United Nations says the largely marginalised indigenous Sahrawi have a right to a referendum on independence. But the poll has yet to take place, posing questions on moves by Rabat and EU to secure any trade deals that involve exploiting resources in the desert area.
The EU court ruled in December 2016 that any such pacts between the EU and Morocco are not applicable to Western Sahara. The Luxembourg-court had also described the Western Sahara as a "separate and distinct" territory from Morocco.
But last week, a set of letters that seek to amend the trade and customs protocols of the EU-Morocco association agreement had been initialed between the EU commission services and Morocco's ministers of foreign affairs and agriculture.
The move was reported as having included the Western Sahara into the scope of the agreement, which the EU commission says is not correct.
A handful of liberal and left-leaning MEPs following the Western Sahara issue had also demanded clarification from the commission in light of the EU court decision in 2016.
The commission says the letters initialled last week have no formal legal value but is instead part of a process in concluding a trade agreement.
It also said it will soon make a proposal on a draft agreement for member states to sign. The draft will also need the consent of the European Parliament.
An adviser to the EU's top court last month said the EU's fisheries agreement with Morocco should be declared invalid because of fishing off the Western Sahara coastline.
Site Section
Related stories
- Top court strikes down EU Western Sahara policy
- EU seeks to extend Morocco fish deal, despite legal opinion
- Morocco deals don't cover Western Sahara, EU lawyer says
- Time for EU to stop being bystander in Western Sahara
- EU divided over Western Balkan enlargement
- MEP: Reality of my three days in occupied Western Sahara