Friday

30th Oct 2020

EU asylum debate reopens old wounds

  • Merkel said she was "not happy" with the deadlock on relocation (Photo: European Union)

Longstanding issues over solidarity in migration and asylum reforms remain unresolved following a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels.

Talks at an EU summit on Thursday (14 December) were never meant to answer the broader and divisive debate but instead set the course for a consensus on internal EU asylum reforms before the end of next June.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • European Council president Donald Tusk has concluded that quotas are 'ineffective' (Photo: European Council)

EU leaders had a "sober" and "frank" discussion over a dinner of roasted langoustine and 'ballotines of capon', according to an EU official - a diplomatic code for tense talks.

The tone of the talks came into sharp relief ahead of the summit when the European Commission accused European Council president Donald Tusk of being "anti-European", after he described the commission's migrant relocation quota policy as "highly divisive" and "ineffective".

Tusk had then put forward a second draft in an effort to soften the quarrel, but left the issue of quotas untouched.

"When Tusk says they are 'ineffective', it is of course in the big picture that relocation does nothing to reduce the number of illegal migrants arriving to Europe," one EU official tried to explain.

"Throwing that note two days before the summit was not helpful," one EU official told this website, adding however that is was not the main problem.

A diplomat noted on the contrary that with Tusk's note, countries that oppose refugees quotas had " for the first time a feeling that Brussels understands them".

Merkel not happy

But German chancellor Angela Merkel shot back, noting "there can't be selective solidarity". Following the 2.5 hour dinner debate on migration, she said she was "not happy" with the situation and that "a big piece of work" still had to be done before the June deadline.

The divide between the member states over the issue remains serious with the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, known as the 'Visegrad Four', leading opposition against any future plans to parcel out asylum seekers on a mandatory basis.

"Quotas are ineffective and I fully support the idea of Donald Tusk," Slovakia's prime minister, Robert Fico, told reporters.

It also raised the question of whether Tusk was over-stepping his mandate, given his suggestion to scrap quotas appeared to challenge the commission's right to initiative on policy and law-making.

The debate dates to 2015 when EU states had voted through a legally-binding mandatory quota rule into a two-year relocation scheme to distribute asylum seekers from the major entry 'hotspots' of Italy and Greece to other member states.

The system was launched following a majority vote among member states, overruling objections from dissenting capitals like Budapest.

The scheme, which initially intended to relocate a total of 160,000 people, was later revised down to under 100,000. Of those, only some 35,000 were deemed eligible following restrictive recognition rate rules.

Such recognition rates have spawned anomalies given that people from the Bahamas are eligible for relocation while Afghans, whose country has seen nothing but war for the past decade, are not.

Although the two-year scheme ended in September, Hungary still hasn't accepted any of the allocated asylum seekers, nor has Poland.

But the European Commission now wants to introduce a similar automated quota system as part of its proposal to reform the 'Dublin' regulation, which determines who processes asylum claims.

Institutional deadlock

EU leaders are supposed to reach a consensus on this reform next June but the large gulf among EU states opens the possibility of having to resort again to a qualified majority vote, the same used to begin the divisive two-year relocation scheme.

"If ever we don't succeed in agreeing by consensus, it is not excluded that these different points are decided by a qualified majority vote," said EU commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, following the discussion.

Furthermore, the European Parliament has backed the commission's proposal and wants a "permanent and automatic relocation mechanism without thresholds" calculated on GDP and population size.

Both the commission and parliament are facing an institutional deadlock with the council, representing member states, given the reoccurring backlash on quotas.

Efforts by the Estonian EU presidency to reach a compromise among all member states were sidelined, despite broad support by the Germans and the commission.

"The Estonian paper is the way to follow," an EU official however told EUobserver, while another pointed out that any compromise between member states would have to take into account the parliament's position, in order not to jeopardise a final agreement between EU institutions.

"We have tried everything. The future [Bulgarian] presidency should be very imaginative to find anything else in there," said Klen Jaarats, an adviser to Estonia's prime minister Juri Ratas.

Migration looms over summit, as Africa pledges fall short

EU summit leaders on Thursday will not reach any deal on migration, while Italy and the Visegrad Group countries confront each other on the Trust Fund for Africa. The debate on internal EU asylum relocation, however, remains off the table.

Showdown EU vote on asylum looking likely for next June

Divisions on relocating asylum seekers remain entrenched following an EU summit. The east-west divide opens up the possibility of relying on a majority vote for a key asylum in June, further exacerbating disputes among opposing capitals.

Analysis

Bell tolls for EU asylum reforms

The cornerstone the EU's asylum reforms referred to by the shorthand as 'Dublin' could end up in the scrapheap following the European elections in May.

EU court bars tests for gay asylum seekers

Authorities in EU countries can no longer impose controversial psychological tests to determine whether an aslyum seeker is telling the truth about their homosexuality.

News in Brief

  1. Polish government rows back on abortion ruling
  2. EU threatens legal action against Poland on rule of law
  3. 'Several dead' after earthquake hits Greece and Turkey
  4. Hungary faces EU court over asylum restrictions
  5. Polish PM urges end to abortion protests to 'protect elderly'
  6. EU to fund cross-border hospital transfers
  7. Some 140 migrants drown on way to Spanish islands
  8. EU central bank preparing new rescue measures

Analysis

'Sponsored returns' may shuffle failed asylum seekers around EU

The European Commission is banking on cooperation and coordination among EU states to help makes its new migration and asylum pact viable. But its plan is already being greeted with suspicion by more hardline anti-migrant countries like Austria and Hungary.

Analysis

Between the lines, Europe's new Moria unfolds

A new five-day screening of migrants at Europe's external borders is meant to expedite people into either 'asylum' or 'return' tracks. The time-limit is wishful thinking and one that could leave people stranded in make-shift camps or even ghettos.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Nice attack: EU urges world leaders to stop hate speech
  2. Europe is back in (partial) lockdown
  3. Gender equality still 60 years away, warns study
  4. I'm an 'election observer' - but what do we actually do?
  5. Deal in reach on linking EU funds to rule of law
  6. EU Commission's Covid-19 expert offers bleak outlook
  7. Belgium's collaboration with Sudan's secret service: my story
  8. What do ordinary Belarusians want from the EU?

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us