Friday

18th Oct 2019

EU asylum debate reopens old wounds

  • Merkel said she was "not happy" with the deadlock on relocation (Photo: European Union)

Longstanding issues over solidarity in migration and asylum reforms remain unresolved following a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels.

Talks at an EU summit on Thursday (14 December) were never meant to answer the broader and divisive debate but instead set the course for a consensus on internal EU asylum reforms before the end of next June.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • European Council president Donald Tusk has concluded that quotas are 'ineffective' (Photo: European Council)

EU leaders had a "sober" and "frank" discussion over a dinner of roasted langoustine and 'ballotines of capon', according to an EU official - a diplomatic code for tense talks.

The tone of the talks came into sharp relief ahead of the summit when the European Commission accused European Council president Donald Tusk of being "anti-European", after he described the commission's migrant relocation quota policy as "highly divisive" and "ineffective".

Tusk had then put forward a second draft in an effort to soften the quarrel, but left the issue of quotas untouched.

"When Tusk says they are 'ineffective', it is of course in the big picture that relocation does nothing to reduce the number of illegal migrants arriving to Europe," one EU official tried to explain.

"Throwing that note two days before the summit was not helpful," one EU official told this website, adding however that is was not the main problem.

A diplomat noted on the contrary that with Tusk's note, countries that oppose refugees quotas had " for the first time a feeling that Brussels understands them".

Merkel not happy

But German chancellor Angela Merkel shot back, noting "there can't be selective solidarity". Following the 2.5 hour dinner debate on migration, she said she was "not happy" with the situation and that "a big piece of work" still had to be done before the June deadline.

The divide between the member states over the issue remains serious with the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, known as the 'Visegrad Four', leading opposition against any future plans to parcel out asylum seekers on a mandatory basis.

"Quotas are ineffective and I fully support the idea of Donald Tusk," Slovakia's prime minister, Robert Fico, told reporters.

It also raised the question of whether Tusk was over-stepping his mandate, given his suggestion to scrap quotas appeared to challenge the commission's right to initiative on policy and law-making.

The debate dates to 2015 when EU states had voted through a legally-binding mandatory quota rule into a two-year relocation scheme to distribute asylum seekers from the major entry 'hotspots' of Italy and Greece to other member states.

The system was launched following a majority vote among member states, overruling objections from dissenting capitals like Budapest.

The scheme, which initially intended to relocate a total of 160,000 people, was later revised down to under 100,000. Of those, only some 35,000 were deemed eligible following restrictive recognition rate rules.

Such recognition rates have spawned anomalies given that people from the Bahamas are eligible for relocation while Afghans, whose country has seen nothing but war for the past decade, are not.

Although the two-year scheme ended in September, Hungary still hasn't accepted any of the allocated asylum seekers, nor has Poland.

But the European Commission now wants to introduce a similar automated quota system as part of its proposal to reform the 'Dublin' regulation, which determines who processes asylum claims.

Institutional deadlock

EU leaders are supposed to reach a consensus on this reform next June but the large gulf among EU states opens the possibility of having to resort again to a qualified majority vote, the same used to begin the divisive two-year relocation scheme.

"If ever we don't succeed in agreeing by consensus, it is not excluded that these different points are decided by a qualified majority vote," said EU commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, following the discussion.

Furthermore, the European Parliament has backed the commission's proposal and wants a "permanent and automatic relocation mechanism without thresholds" calculated on GDP and population size.

Both the commission and parliament are facing an institutional deadlock with the council, representing member states, given the reoccurring backlash on quotas.

Efforts by the Estonian EU presidency to reach a compromise among all member states were sidelined, despite broad support by the Germans and the commission.

"The Estonian paper is the way to follow," an EU official however told EUobserver, while another pointed out that any compromise between member states would have to take into account the parliament's position, in order not to jeopardise a final agreement between EU institutions.

"We have tried everything. The future [Bulgarian] presidency should be very imaginative to find anything else in there," said Klen Jaarats, an adviser to Estonia's prime minister Juri Ratas.

Migration looms over summit, as Africa pledges fall short

EU summit leaders on Thursday will not reach any deal on migration, while Italy and the Visegrad Group countries confront each other on the Trust Fund for Africa. The debate on internal EU asylum relocation, however, remains off the table.

Showdown EU vote on asylum looking likely for next June

Divisions on relocating asylum seekers remain entrenched following an EU summit. The east-west divide opens up the possibility of relying on a majority vote for a key asylum in June, further exacerbating disputes among opposing capitals.

Analysis

Bell tolls for EU asylum reforms

The cornerstone the EU's asylum reforms referred to by the shorthand as 'Dublin' could end up in the scrapheap following the European elections in May.

Focus

EU court bars tests for gay asylum seekers

Authorities in EU countries can no longer impose controversial psychological tests to determine whether an aslyum seeker is telling the truth about their homosexuality.

News in Brief

  1. Macron: Nato's inability to react to Turkey a 'mistake'
  2. EU: US can expect counter measures after tariff move
  3. Almost 7,500 people forcibly returned to Libya in 2019
  4. Puigdemont released after responding to arrest warrant
  5. Commission: Facebook's Libra needs international approach
  6. Italian PM: denial of accession talks a 'historic mistake'
  7. Catalan president blames clashes on 'infiltrators'
  8. US imposes €6.7bn new tariffs on European products

Opinion

Europe's refugee policy is test of its true 'way of life'

As ex-national leaders, we know it's not easy to withstand public pressures and put collective interests ahead of domestic concerns. But without strong institutional leadership, EU values themselves risk ringing hollow, not least to those seeking protection on Europe's shores.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersBrussels welcomes Nordic culture
  2. UNESDAUNESDA appoints Nicholas Hodac as Director General
  3. UNESDASoft drinks industry co-signs Circular Plastics Alliance Declaration
  4. FEANIEngineers Europe Advisory Group: Building the engineers of the future
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNew programme studies infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance
  6. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  10. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  12. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  2. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  3. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  4. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  8. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  9. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  12. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us