Wednesday

2nd Dec 2020

Denmark's border controls 'insufficiently justified', says commission

  • Denmark announced the border controls in May (Photo: Steve Wilson)

The European Commission on Monday (18 July) warned Denmark it had given insufficient grounds for taking the controversial step of re-introducing border controls and said further EU monitoring is needed.

The rebuke followed a visit by EU officials to the Danish-German and Danish-Swedish borders at the end of last week to monitor the scope of the new controls, announced in May.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

EU experts were "unable to get sufficient justifications from the Danish side for the intensification of the controls at the internal borders," said EU home affairs commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom in a statement.

The commissioner also warned that she would "not hesitate to use all tools" to ensure that EU law guaranteeing the free movement of peoples, goods and services is upheld.

An EU source explained that all border checks need to be based on risk assessment. An increased incidence of stolen cars could justify more car checks. Information on a human trafficking ring could justify checks on lorries. But such checks need to be detailed in a report specifying what was found.

The Danish customs officials have "no books" on what they are checking and when, the source said. Malmstrom has asked for this in a letter sent to the Danish authorities and warned she wants "regular information" from Copenhagen, while not ruling out "further visits".

Reacting to the commission's criticism, Danish foreign minister Lene Espersen said: "It is very important for Danish authorities to answer all the outstanding questions, but this is for the ministry of finance and the customs authority to do. We will respect all our obligations under the Schengen code and EU law."

She also added that that there have been "a lot of misunderstanding" surrounding the issue.

The escalating dispute has much wider symbolic importance than the face value question of whether Copenhagen is violating an EU law.

Re-instating controls at an internal border undermines the EU's Schengen Agreement allowing passport free travel in most of the EU's 27 member states, widely considered, along with the euro, to be one of the most far-reaching integrative steps in the bloc's history.

Copenhagen justified its move by saying that the open borders was facilitating crime but the border checks were widely seen as a quid pro quo deal with the populist Danish People's Party, whose support was necessary to secure a key reform to the pensions system.

Denmark's unilateral decision came at the height of a wider discussion on whether the EU needed to reform the Schengen rules, prompted by a dispute between Rome and Paris over Tunisian migrants making their way from Italy to France.

Pressed by Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi and his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy, EU leaders in June agreed the rules needed to be changed to allow as a "very last resort" the reintroduction of border controls in "truly critical" situations.

The commission has been tasked to come up with proposals in this political and legal minefield in September, but the Polish EU presidency is already looking at ways to strengthen the external border so as to "avoid by any means" the re-establishment of internal borders.

EU commission wants nations to give up border control decisions

The EU commission wants to have a central role in decisions on the reintroduction of border controls, so far a prerogative of individual member states. A draft proposal will be put forward next week and is already causing a stir in pre-election Denmark.

Netherlands to beef up border surveillance

Heavily reliant on the anti-immigrant vote, the Dutch government plans to introduce an automatic video-surveillance system along its borders. Hague diplomats meanwhile are breaking ranks over what they see as the Netherlands' increasingly isolationist stance.

EU law needed to protect free press, NGOs say

More than 60 NGOs and media, including EUobserver, have signed a call for an EU-wide law to stop the rich and powerful from silencing critics with malicious litigation.

Frontex takes transparency activists to EU court

The EU border agency Frontex's annual budget for 2020 is €460m. Now they are launching court proceedings against two pro-transparency campaigners for not paying them €24,000 in legal fees after losing a case last year.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic climate debate on 17 November!
  2. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  4. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector

Latest News

  1. EU law needed to protect free press, NGOs say
  2. Socialists demand resignation of EU border-agency chief
  3. Orbán ally admits he was at Brussels lockdown 'sex party'
  4. Legal battle over oil giant Shell's emissions begins
  5. Chance for Christian Democrats to draw line against extremism
  6. Frontex takes transparency activists to EU court
  7. EU's opportunity to curb online politics ads
  8. China and Russia encircling divided Western allies

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us