Monday

22nd Apr 2019

Denmark's border controls 'insufficiently justified', says commission

  • Denmark announced the border controls in May (Photo: Steve Wilson)

The European Commission on Monday (18 July) warned Denmark it had given insufficient grounds for taking the controversial step of re-introducing border controls and said further EU monitoring is needed.

The rebuke followed a visit by EU officials to the Danish-German and Danish-Swedish borders at the end of last week to monitor the scope of the new controls, announced in May.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

EU experts were "unable to get sufficient justifications from the Danish side for the intensification of the controls at the internal borders," said EU home affairs commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom in a statement.

The commissioner also warned that she would "not hesitate to use all tools" to ensure that EU law guaranteeing the free movement of peoples, goods and services is upheld.

An EU source explained that all border checks need to be based on risk assessment. An increased incidence of stolen cars could justify more car checks. Information on a human trafficking ring could justify checks on lorries. But such checks need to be detailed in a report specifying what was found.

The Danish customs officials have "no books" on what they are checking and when, the source said. Malmstrom has asked for this in a letter sent to the Danish authorities and warned she wants "regular information" from Copenhagen, while not ruling out "further visits".

Reacting to the commission's criticism, Danish foreign minister Lene Espersen said: "It is very important for Danish authorities to answer all the outstanding questions, but this is for the ministry of finance and the customs authority to do. We will respect all our obligations under the Schengen code and EU law."

She also added that that there have been "a lot of misunderstanding" surrounding the issue.

The escalating dispute has much wider symbolic importance than the face value question of whether Copenhagen is violating an EU law.

Re-instating controls at an internal border undermines the EU's Schengen Agreement allowing passport free travel in most of the EU's 27 member states, widely considered, along with the euro, to be one of the most far-reaching integrative steps in the bloc's history.

Copenhagen justified its move by saying that the open borders was facilitating crime but the border checks were widely seen as a quid pro quo deal with the populist Danish People's Party, whose support was necessary to secure a key reform to the pensions system.

Denmark's unilateral decision came at the height of a wider discussion on whether the EU needed to reform the Schengen rules, prompted by a dispute between Rome and Paris over Tunisian migrants making their way from Italy to France.

Pressed by Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi and his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy, EU leaders in June agreed the rules needed to be changed to allow as a "very last resort" the reintroduction of border controls in "truly critical" situations.

The commission has been tasked to come up with proposals in this political and legal minefield in September, but the Polish EU presidency is already looking at ways to strengthen the external border so as to "avoid by any means" the re-establishment of internal borders.

EU commission wants nations to give up border control decisions

The EU commission wants to have a central role in decisions on the reintroduction of border controls, so far a prerogative of individual member states. A draft proposal will be put forward next week and is already causing a stir in pre-election Denmark.

Netherlands to beef up border surveillance

Heavily reliant on the anti-immigrant vote, the Dutch government plans to introduce an automatic video-surveillance system along its borders. Hague diplomats meanwhile are breaking ranks over what they see as the Netherlands' increasingly isolationist stance.

Magazine

All about the European Parliament elections 2019

EUobserver's new magazine is meant to help readers prepare for the European Parliament elections, no matter their level of knowledge. You can download and read the entire magazine now.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  2. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  3. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  4. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  9. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  10. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan

Latest News

  1. Romania drafts EU code on NGO migrant rescues
  2. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Malta shamed on press unfreedom
  3. EU drafts $20bn US sanctions list in aviation dispute
  4. Brunei defends stoning to death of gay men in EU letter
  5. US Democrats side with Ireland on Brexit
  6. Wifi or 5G to connect EU cars? MEPs weigh in
  7. How Brexit may harm the new EU parliament
  8. EU parliament backs whistleblower law

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us