Tuesday

1st Dec 2020

Opinion

Berlin, Madrid, Amsterdam fought Commission - and won

  • Berlin. The EU directive would have forced local, regional, and national authorities to notify the Commission of any new planned regulations affecting the services sector three months in advance (Photo: Nicolas Nova)

An outcry from major European city governments - such as Amsterdam, Berlin, Madrid, Barcelona and Budapest - has helped shelve an EU Commission power grab over the services industry.

In a little-noticed procedural manoeuvre, last month the commission was forced to withdraw a so-called 'Services Notification Procedure' - which would have given it advance veto power over new laws by regional and local governments, and could have further limited local democratic initiatives in areas as varied as affordable housing, energy supply and waste management.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The commission should learn this lesson, and support municipalities to enact social and environmental measures, respect their democratic right to regulate, and roll back obstacles that prioritise corporate interests over local residents.

The commission's goal had been to tighten the enforcement of the EU's 2006 Services Directive.

But negotiations with EU governments got bogged down due to growing concerns over the regulatory freedom of local, regional, and national authorities.

It was finally withdrawn when, in the commission's words, there was "no foreseeable agreement" possible.

A key, though underreported, factor was resistance by progressive cities and civil society groups from across Europe.

The reason they were up in arms was simple: the directive would have forced local, regional, and national authorities to notify the European Commission of any new planned regulations affecting the services sector three months in advance (rather than afterwards as is currently the case).

This would have meant a delay, while municipalities waited for the commission to use its advance veto power to reject or approve the planned regulation.

An early vocal critic was the city council of Amsterdam, whose September 2018 resolution stated the directive would "seriously harm the autonomy of local governments", posing "a threat to local democracy".

The mayors of Amsterdam, Berlin, Madrid, Barcelona, Budapest, and Riga wrote a strongly-worded letter to EU negotiators, slamming the proposed directive for creating administrative burdens and harming their ability to act and regulate in the public interest.

Another open letter opposing the directive was signed by more than 160 civil society groups, trade unions, mayors, and progressive municipal parties.

Cities vs the 'Single Market'

At the heart of the battle around the directive is the clash between cities fighting for their democratic right to regulate and protect the interests of their citizens, and a European Commission that is obsessed with "completing the Single Market" and removing what multinational corporations consider to be "regulatory barriers".

The commission's single market department (DG GROW) tends to favour services industry lobby groups when they complain that local regulations they dislike are "violations" of the Services Directive.

Plenty of entirely legitimate regulations have been targeted by the commission as "regulatory barriers" that supposedly "discriminate" against non-domestic companies.

For instance, DG GROW has repeatedly clashed with cities trying to restrict the expansion of AirBnB and other short-term rental platforms in order to prevent skyrocketing rents.

DG GROW has a very cosy relationship with AirBnB lobbyists; and industry lobby groups BusinessEurope, EuroCommerce, and EuroChambres were given VIP treatment in the drafting of the Services Notifications Procedure Directive.

This clash between corporate-friendly single market rules versus municipalities' right to regulate in the public interest is growing as cities become increasingly ambitious and pro-active players in tackling problems, from the climate emergency to the lack of affordable housing.

Municipalist cities like Barcelona, Grenoble, and Amsterdam, are turning their backs on neoliberalism and introducing bold and innovative local solutions.

The corona crisis has further underlined the crucial role of cities in solving societal problems.

The withdrawal of the Services Notifications Directive is an important victory for Europe's cities and should be a wake-up call for the commission.

Instead of attempting to restrict cities' regulatory space, it should empower their efforts to tackle social and environmental problems. Unfortunately the EU commission's attitude seems unchanged, as evidenced by its new measures.

In March 2020 the commission launched a Single Market Enforcement Action Plan (SMEAP), with new "steps to ensure that member states comply with the existing notification obligation under the Services Directive in order to identify and eliminate new potential regulatory barriers".

One such step is the commission's launch of a new website where it posts all the notifications of services sector regulations received from the national level.

It then invites comments on the notifications from governments, but also from corporate lobby groups.

In November 2019 the Commission actively advised retail industry lobby group EuroCommerce about this site, stressing to them that interest groups "are invited to provide comments".

An example of how this new mechanism works in practice is the complaints submitted by the European Holiday Home Association (EHHA) and its German member group in February 2020.

One Spanish island fights back

Freedom of Information requests show that this lobby group (a mouthpiece of AirBnB) targeted new restrictions on holiday home rentals on the tiny Spanish island of Formentera.

The measures (including a 60-day yearly maximum for short-term rental of primary residences) are intended to tackle critical shortages in drinking water and reduce the island's fast-growing volumes of household waste, both exacerbated by tourism, as well as lower fossil fuel use.

In addition, tourist-accommodation demand has left local people without affordable housing options. Yet the EHHA complained the rules impose "discriminatory, unjustified, un-proportionate and unsuitable measures to short term rentals in the Balearic Islands".

The commission immediately sent a letter to the island council of Formentera with a long list of critical questions, demanding "justification and proportionality" around what they argued "constitutes a restriction to the economic freedom to rent".

In July 2020 the island council sent a 16-page legal response.

It remains to be seen whether the commission decides to start an infringement procedure against the Spanish government or takes other measures against the Formentera rules.

The aggressive questioning of Formentera's council by the commission (on behalf of narrow commercial interests) shows how the services deregulation agenda is at odds with the EU's stated social and environmental objectives, including the European Green Deal.

It's high time for the commission to get its priorities right, abandon outdated neoliberal assumptions and respect local authorities' right to regulate.

Author bio

Olivier Hoedeman is a researcher at Corporate Europe Observatory, an NGO which researches corporate lobbying in Brussels.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Nine-in-ten EU regions face revenue plunge, report finds

The decrease of revenues in 2020 of subnational authorities in France, Germany and Italy alone is estimated to be €30bn for the three countries, a new report by the European Committee of the Regions says.

Coronavirus

Major regional discrepancies in Covid-19 response, report finds

EU regions were unevenly hit by the coronavirus pandemic, according to a new report. The most economically hard-hit regions were those under strict lockdown measures for the longest - not necessarily those with the highest death-rates or most cases detected.

EU regions: pandemic should force decision-making rethink

EU regions say the upcoming Conference on the Future of Europe is a "timely opportunity" to debate how to make local and regional authorities full- involved in the EU response to Covid-19 - even including possible EU treaty changes.

News in Brief

  1. EU medical agency to decide on Pfizer and Moderna vaccines
  2. Euro-bailout fund to also help banks
  3. Trade unions urge date for pay transparency directive
  4. 33 governments must answer youth climate lawsuit
  5. US slams Hungarian article for Soros/Hitler comparison
  6. Sturgeon doesn't rule out 2021 Scottish independence vote
  7. Hungary's Orban and Poland's Morawiecki meet again
  8. Gran Canaria migrant camp dismantled

The human cost of whistleblowing

The fate of Jonathan Taylor, a British whistleblower stuck in legal limbo in Croatia, is a test of European laws designed to protect those who put themselves at risk for the common good.

EU vs US tech agenda under Biden

What will the new Joe Biden administration bring to the realm of digital policy, and how will it affect the relationship with the EU?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic climate debate on 17 November!
  2. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  4. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector

Latest News

  1. China and Russia encircling divided Western allies
  2. Fish complicates last push for post-Brexit deal
  3. EU emissions down 24% on 1990 - but still off 2030 target
  4. Hungary must keep Russian vaccine within borders, says EU
  5. If EU is serious, it should use more US liquified gas, not less
  6. EU taxpayers in the dark on US corona-drug deal
  7. EU debates first names to go on human rights blacklist
  8. Lithuania bids to host EU cyber-centre

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us