Friday

9th Dec 2022

Opinion

Hungary: why we can't support a global minimum tax

  • In principle, Hungary fully supports the fight against base erosion and profit shifting, but we believe that the fight against harmful tax competition should not become a fight against the competitiveness of tax systems (Photo: ptmoney.com)

On 1 July, the majority of members of the OECD Inclusive Framework (IF) agreed on the main building blocks of new tax legislation for the digital economy (Pillar 1) and a global minimum tax (Pillar 2).

However, some IF members, including Hungary and two other EU member states, did not join the agreement. This is why.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The new agreement covers only a few key factors of the planned legislation, with important technical elements not yet decided upon. The agreement provides only a range for several numerical parameters and many uncertainties surround the base for the new minimum tax.

The IF plans to finalise all details by October, and an acceptable compromise should be possible by then.

However, the agreement lacks guarantees on some critical questions. For this reason, Hungary will be a constructive participant in the work that remains - but will not formally sign on to the agreement until every detail is clear.

In principle, Hungary fully supports the fight against base erosion and profit shifting, but we believe that the fight against harmful tax competition should not become a fight against the competitiveness of tax systems.

Consequently, the legislation should only cover highly mobile profits that are disproportionately high compared to the underlying level of real economic activity.

Different situations in capitalisation and inequality and differences in economic-policy priorities require different tax policies. Certain tax incentives can also significantly contribute to economic growth. Well-known examples include R&D incentives, accelerated depreciation and notional interest deduction systems, which can neutralise the effect of inflation on the tax base and the debt-equity bias.

These measures are often promoted by international organisations as well. Consequently, the regulation must fully respect countries' sovereignty to provide such incentives.

To reach that goal, normal profits attributed to substantial economic activity shall be carved out from the minimum tax base. The agreement addresses this, but the proposed rate is still very low.

While Pillar 1 exempts 10 percent of revenue, Pillar 2 exempts 'at least five percent' of the book value of tangible assets and payroll costs. Taking into account that the average revenue of MNEs is significantly higher than the sum of tangible assets and payroll, 'normal' profits exempted under Pillar 1 is on average 3 to 4 times higher than the profit carved out under Pillar 2.

Level-playing field

The proposal should also ensure a level playing field.

Minimum tax rules shall equally cover the parent company and its foreign subsidiaries. The July agreement opened the possibility of a delayed application of the Undertaxed Payment Rule (UTPR), which covers the ultimate parent entity.

Within the EU, any differentiation between the parent and the subsidiary would go against fundamental freedoms. Consequently, the EU could only adopt the rules by covering parent entities from the beginning — a serious disadvantage for EU-based MNEs.

While parent jurisdictions outside the EU could provide tax incentives, e.g., R&D tax credits without limit, EU members could not.

Therefore, Hungary cannot support the EU implementation of the rules before UTPR globally enters into force.

Additionally, the global minimum tax does not aim to harmonise tax bases but ensure a minimum level of taxation on highly mobile profits. Technical differences between tax systems will persist, and no best practice will be provided in this field.

Subsequently, the proposal needs to be flexible enough to treat these differences fairly. Companies around the world pay different taxes, with CIT often a minor part of their total tax burden. Therefore, the range of taxes used to calculate the tax base should be as broad as possible.

The treatment of tax-base differences is also a crucial issue.

The minimum tax base will be established using accounting standards of the parent jurisdictions', which differ from those in the subsidiaries' jurisdictions. Many of the differences affect only the timing of the tax liability, which may lead to double taxation if not treated adequately.

Even worse, there is no single global accounting standard to align the tax bases. CbCR data show that such differences cause significant distortions, with at least one-fifth of companies facing effective tax rates below 10 percent in the highest-tax countries. Consequently, there may be a high, unpredictable tax burden on cross-border investments.

The 2020 Blueprint of the OECD could not adequately address these issues, and while the working group has since explored more promising approaches, no final decision has been made.

Finally, the legislation should include satisfactory grandfathering rules on tax credits acquired before the agreement entered into force. Hungary provides generous tax credits to promote investment in its lagging regions under the EU's General Block Exemption Regulation. It would be unfair if these incentives ended up enriching the most developed member states' budgets.

Finding adequate solutions to address these concerns is a prerequisite for Hungary to join the final agreement in October.

Author bio

Norbert Izer is state secretary for tax affairs at the ministry of finance for the Hungarian government.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU may delay approval of Hungary's recovery plan

The EU executive is analysing the latest replies it received from the Hungarian authorities which only arrived last Friday. MEPs have urged the commission not to approve Hungary's plan until an effective anti-fraud system is in place.

EU Commission eyes unified corporate tax, again

The previous two efforts for a unified corporate tax framework have run into the ground, because the unanimity required by the member states to agree such a scheme was unachievable. Ireland, Denmark, Luxembourg, Malta, Sweden and the Netherlands were opposed.

Poland and Hungary win at EU court on taxes

The Hungarian tax initially imposed a rate of 50 percent of sales on the biggest networks. Critics saw this as an attack on RTL Klub, the country's most-watched commercial broadcaster, and as a way of undermining the free press.

European banks book €20bn a year in tax havens

The research estimates that a 25-percent minimum tax rate (the lowest current rate within the seven largest world economies) would net member states an extra €10-13bn a year in tax revenue.

No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU

The European Commission has asked the member states' leaders assembling in Brussels next week for the customary end-of-year European Council to approve EU candidate status for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Doing so would be a mistake.

The military-industrial complex cashing-in on the Ukraine war

From the outset, arms manufacturers eyed this war as a profitable business opportunity. Structural changes took place across the EU, not only to fast-track arms to Ukraine, but also to make more public finance available to the highly-lucrative arms industry.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  4. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  5. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos

Latest News

  1. EU Commission silent on Greek spyware sale to Madagascar
  2. A plea to the EU from inside Tehran's Evin jail
  3. EU lets Croatia into Schengen, keeps Bulgaria and Romania out
  4. Energy crisis costs thousands of EU jobs, but industrial output stable
  5. Illegal pushbacks happening daily in Croatia, says NGO
  6. No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU
  7. EU takes legal action against China over Lithuania
  8. EU Commission shoring up children's rights of same-sex parents

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  2. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  4. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us