11th Aug 2022


Is EU serious about human rights in Kazakhstan?

  • If we take an honest look at president Kassym-Jomart Tokayev government's promises for reforms, there's little to show for all of the rhetoric. Kazakhstan remains deeply authoritarian and undemocratic, with basic human rights violated regularly (Photo: Wikimedia)
Listen to article

President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan is no stranger to making human rights and political reform pledges and his administration knows well that 'talking the talk' on human rights in high level meetings with Western diplomats is one way to stave off potential criticism.

There is little doubt he will take this approach on his visit to Brussels on Thursday and Friday (25-26) November, but EU officials should push back.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The EU has invested significantly in its relations with Kazakhstan, the most powerful economy in Central Asia and a country eager to engage internationally. The Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between Kazakhstan and the EU, which entered into force in March 2020 and includes human rights provisions, deepened relations.

But the European Parliament has regularly expressed concern about human rights in Kazakhstan, most recently in February.

So the EU has an opportunity, and leverage, to address important human rights issues during president Tokayev's visit – and to expect real answers.

There's a moral imperative to do so. If we take an honest look past the Kazakh government's promises for reforms, there's little to show for all of the rhetoric. Kazakhstan remains deeply authoritarian and undemocratic, with basic human rights violated regularly.

It has never had an election deemed free and fair by credible international observers. Kazakh authorities show unwavering intolerance towards any group, movement, or party critical of the government, and have arbitrarily applied abusive 'extremism' accusations against political opposition groups to send their proponents to court or to prison.

Many people accused of affiliation with the Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan, banned as "extremist" since 2018, and the Koshe (Street) Party, banned in 2020, have faced politically motivated criminal charges. The court decisions to ban the groups failed to show any evidence that they had advocated or engaged in violent extremism.

Kazakhstan authorities take a similarly heavy-handed approach to media and speech freedoms, moving to control or silence those who criticize the government.

In May, an Instagram-user faced a criminal investigation for "disseminating false information" on his openly satirical account. Just weeks ago, the popular website of HOLA News was blocked for several days following an article commenting on the alleged links between former president Nursultan Nazarbayev and offshore companies exposed by the Pandora Papers.

Parliament is considering a draft law that would require social media platforms, under the pretext of protecting children, to register a local presence in Kazakhstan and comply with the government's content take-down orders.

The case of our civil society colleague Max Bokaev speaks for itself. Bokaev was released in February after serving an unfair five-year prison sentence for peacefully protesting against proposed land reforms. But as soon as he was released, the authorities imposed new restrictions on him preventing him from engaging in civil society activities.

No demonstrations, but wife-beating is legal

Despite a supposedly reformed peaceful assembly law, protests in Kazakhstan continue to be routinely dispersed and participants fined or detained. The authorities deny registration to independent trade unions, putting workers who try to defend workers interests, including by organising strikes, at serious risk of unfounded sanctions.

President Tokayev has spoken publicly about the importance of protecting women's rights, yet there is still no commitment to criminalise domestic violence.

Although security and Afghanistan are likely to feature heavily on the EU's agenda with president Tokayev, it is important for EU leaders not to tone down their concerns on the country's flawed human rights record. Regional security concerns and domestic human rights concerns should not be mutually exclusive. Pushing human rights concerns under the carpet only risks paving the way for more abuses, insecurity, and instability.

If they are serious about their commitment to promote rights in central Asia, EU Commission president Ursula Von Der Leyen and Council president Charles Michel should make it clear in their talks with president Tokayev as well as in any public comments on his visit that unfulfilled reform promises and talk alone aren't good enough for the EU.

They should press their counterpart to stop using broadly defined "extremism" charges to lock up peaceful critics; to let civil society, independent trade unions, and the media operate freely; and to protect women and girls by explicitly criminalising domestic violence. This is the bare minimum Kazakh citizens can expect from the European Union.

Author bio

Philippe Dam is the EU advocacy director and Mihra Rittmann is a senior Europe and Central Asia researcher, both at Human Rights Watch


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Kazakhstan lobbies MEPs ahead of human rights vote

Kazakhstan has been lobbying the European Parliament to scupper a vote on human rights, as it attempts to gain international standing. But most political groups will move ahead to pass a resolution naming victims of the regime.


Global hunger crisis requires more than just the Odessa deal

International donors are playing hide and seek. Instead of stepping up their assistance programmes, richer nations are cutting overseas aid, or reallocating funds from other parts of the world towards the Ukraine crisis.

Exploiting the Ukraine crisis for Big Business

From food policy to climate change, corporate lobbyists are exploiting the Ukraine crisis to try to slash legislation that gets in the way of profit. But this is only making things worse.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us