10th Dec 2022


How to prosecute Russia for environmental crimes in Ukraine

  • The International Criminal Court has a provision addressing environmental crimes in the statute under war crimes (Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine)
Listen to article

Ukraine reminds us that wars are amongst the worst things that can happen not just to mankind, but also to nature.

The brutality of the Russian Federation's military invasion of Ukraine has brought with it terrible humanitarian consequences and serious environmental harm. In a preliminary environmental impact monitoring, the United Nations Environment Programme has warned that Ukraine will be left with a toxic environmental legacy for generations to come.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

During the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Lugano, Switzerland earlier this month, Ukraine announced that a full recovery will cost a staggering $750bn [€739].

As with the successful Marshall Plan after World War II, it is important to lay down the foundation of the Ukrainian plan well in advance.

Equally important is that the post-war recovery be done sustainably.

For example, when the energy infrastructure is rebuilt, it should be fuelled by renewables; when forests are restored, they should be protected from unsustainable logging; when homes are rebuilt, they should meet high energy-efficiency standards. Ukraine's future should be as green as possible.

We are heartened that many countries have already committed to contributing to the recovery of Ukraine. However, full responsibility for the damage must lie with the Russian Federation and its actors.

Hitherto, the international community has rightfully focused on increasing sanctions. Now is the time to begin establishing targeted accountability mechanisms.

Investigations into possible war crimes were launched by both Ukraine's general prosecutor and the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) less than a week into the Russian invasion.

To date, authorities in at least a dozen other states have also opened universal jurisdiction investigations into alleged war crimes in Ukraine.

All efforts should strive to be as concerted as possible. Particularly with respect to the documentation of environmental harm, it would be advisable to prioritise the gathering of evidence and its preservation, because any delay or neglect could result in missed opportunities for effective documentation leading to charges and possible prosecution.

Statutes and ratification

As the ICC celebrates the 20th anniversary of the entry into force of the Rome Statute, it is presented with an opportunity to invoke for the first time the only provision addressing environmental crimes in the Statute under War Crimes, article 8(2)(b)(iv). Ukraine should also take the overdue step of acceding to the Rome Statute.

Ratification would give it the opportunity to seek cooperation and request assistance from the court as per the office of the prosecutor's 2016 Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritisation with respect to ecocide, which also constitutes a serious crime under Ukraine's domestic law. Ending impunity for ecocide would send a strong signal that causing serious harm to the environment is unacceptable in any war zone.

Existing institutions are rarely suitable when seeking accountability for military crimes, which is why, historically, tailor-made international bodies have been established for such purposes.

For instance, the UN Compensation Commission successfully processed claims and compensated entities for damages suffered as a result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990-1991; the Independent Investigative Mechanism of Myanmar was set up in 2018 to collect evidence of the most serious violations of international law and to prepare cases for criminal prosecution.

Similar international bodies, with the aim of achieving liability and criminal accountability, should be created in the case of Ukraine.

A clean, healthy and sustainable environment is vital for Ukraine's future.

While the international community has a responsibility to aid Ukraine in its sustainable recovery plan, it must not overlook its obligation to invoke and, when necessary, reinforce international environmental norms and legal mechanisms to hold the perpetrators accountable.

Author bio

Simon Holmström is an MP of the Åland parliament, Nordic Council delegate, member of the Ecocide Alliance.

Shirleen Chin is director of Green Transparency, senior legal advisor for the Institute for Environmental Security and member of the IUCN World Commission on Environmental Law.

Christiana Mauro is senior advisor to the Biosphere Institute and member of Guta Environmental Law Association.

Doug Weir is research and policy director at the Conflict and Environment Observatory.

Stephen Stec is senior fellow and lead researcher on environment and democracy at Central European University Democracy Institute.

Mikko Pyhälä is Finnish ambassador emeritus and chair of governing council of Pekka Kuusi Eco Foundation.

Yuliia Ovchynnykova is a Ukrainian MP and member of the committee on environmental policy and nature management.

Olena Kravchenko is director of Environment People Law and member of the executive board of Guta Environmental Law Association.

Hanna Khomechko is development director of Environment People Law.

Wouter Veening is president of the Institute for Environmental Security.

Dmytro Skrylnikov is chairman of the Bureau of Environmental Investigations and vice chair of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee.

Iryna Zaverukha is adjunct lecturer at Gould School of Law at University of Southern California.

Marie Toussaint is a French MEP and member of the committee of legal affairs, initiator and member of the Ecocide Alliance.

Rebecka Le Moine is a Swedish Green MP, biologist, and member of the Ecocide Alliance.

Frederika Schweighoferova is director of the Rome Statute System Campaign, and Parliamentarians for Global Action.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Chernobyl staff relieved after weeks, but risks remain

After weeks of continuous work and extreme pressure, staff at Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine were finally relieved by boat via the Pripyat river — but situation at high-risk site is still far from normal, the UN nuclear watchdog said.

How to apply the Nuremberg model for Russian war crimes

A Special Tribunal on Russian war crimes in Ukraine must be convened, because no permanent or existing international judicial institution is endowed with jurisdiction over Russian high-ranking officials, writes the head of the Ukraine delegation to the Council of Europe.

On Ukraine Independence Day — a look ahead

Once the hostilities eventually end, the affected parties will have to embark on the process of reconciliation. That requires documenting and prosecuting of Russian war crimes — and for that, we need to support Ukrainian civil society organisations.

Exploiting the Ukraine crisis for Big Business

From food policy to climate change, corporate lobbyists are exploiting the Ukraine crisis to try to slash legislation that gets in the way of profit. But this is only making things worse.

No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU

The European Commission has asked the member states' leaders assembling in Brussels next week for the customary end-of-year European Council to approve EU candidate status for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Doing so would be a mistake.

The military-industrial complex cashing-in on the Ukraine war

From the outset, arms manufacturers eyed this war as a profitable business opportunity. Structural changes took place across the EU, not only to fast-track arms to Ukraine, but also to make more public finance available to the highly-lucrative arms industry.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  4. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  5. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos

Latest News

  1. EU Commission silent on Greek spyware sale to Madagascar
  2. A plea to the EU from inside Tehran's Evin jail
  3. EU lets Croatia into Schengen, keeps Bulgaria and Romania out
  4. Energy crisis costs thousands of EU jobs, but industrial output stable
  5. Illegal pushbacks happening daily in Croatia, says NGO
  6. No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU
  7. EU takes legal action against China over Lithuania
  8. EU Commission shoring up children's rights of same-sex parents

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  2. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  4. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us