29th Sep 2022


How scary is threat to Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant?

  • Even if the reactors themselves are well protected against damage, the cooling systems rely on exterior pipeline connections. The backup diesel generators, electrical substations and control rooms, moreover, feature only moderate protection (Photo: Al Jazeera screengrab)
Listen to article

Russia has launched targeted assaults deploying heavy weaponry against nuclear facilities in Ukraine. The Kremlin's use of nuclear power plants as part of its military tactics abhorrently contradicts international humanitarian law. It is apparent that Russia has employed the facilities as warehouses for its military supplies and as 'safe' corridors for its troops in a callous calculation that the sensitive nature of the sites render them immune from Ukrainian counterattacks.

Moscow's behaviour rather resembles that of a terrorist.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The recent shelling of Zaporizhizhia nuclear power plant (NPP) was not merely a sporadic attack but rather underscored the direct threat of nuclear reactor destruction. Given absent control of the site and its nuclear fuel assemblies, the possibility is left open for Russia via irregular mercenaries, like the Wagner Group, to use the situation to extort the entire democratic world.

While some experts have played down the risks of a disaster concerning nuclear facilities in Ukraine amid the ongoing conflict, these assessments understate the threat.

Ukrainian and international militaries, nuclear experts and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have not sufficiently factored in the possibility that Russia could wilfully deploy troops in near proximity of the nuclear facilities and/or threaten reactor destruction to blackmail Ukraine and the democratic world like the worst terrorist.

On 3 March 2022, Russian troops repeatedly used heavy weapons (armoured vehicles and tanks) to attack the infrastructure of working reactors, the administrative building and the training centre at the Zaporizhzhia NPP.

The evidence that soon after emerged diverged from early comments by the IAEA that had acknowledged the gravity of the assault but emphasised that the action took place away from the reactors.

Even if the reactors themselves are well protected against damage, the cooling systems rely on exterior pipeline connections. The backup diesel generators, electrical substations and control rooms, moreover, feature only moderate protection.

And the mining of access routes, and the unpredictable behaviour of Russian troops based there, further undermine the ability of officials and experts to react adequately to possible emergencies and accidents at the Zaporizhzhia NPP and organise the evacuation of local inhabitants.

Following its occupation of the site, Russia has indeed deployed mines in the area, stationed numerous troops armed with heavy weapons at the plant and brought a group of Rosatom specialists to the NPP.

The Kremlin claims that the facility belongs to Rosatom and consequently must operate in accordance with Rosatom decrees.

Ukrainian staff remain at the plant and continue to ensure its safe operation, maintenance and monitoring. Ukraine's nuclear power operator has also restored its link to the surveillance systems of the facility and kept producing electricity in the United Energy System of Ukraine.

Five scenarios

It is becoming increasingly apparent, however, that Moscow is seeking to change the operational mode of the NPP and use the situation for other illicit purposes. Possible current or future scenarios include but are not limited to the following:

1. Russia is attempting to disconnect the Zaporizhzhia NPP from the united energy system of Ukraine and redirect at least part of its capacities to supply electricity to occupied Crimea and southeast Ukraine.

2. Russia is using Zaporizhzhia NPP as a military base — the mere existence of the nuclear plant functions like a shield precluding Ukrainian counterattacks and steering Kyiv's allies to limit military support and even urge Ukraine to postpone its offensives. Against the backdrop of Ukraine's recent successes near Kherson, Russia began shelling the facility and the area around it. The damage inflicted includes reportedly a firefighting unit and coolant pumping station, several radiation level control sensors at the dry storage site for spent nuclear fuel and the forced shut-down of one reactor.

3. Zaporizhzhia NPP is a success case for Westinghouse VVER-1000 fuel utilisation in Soviet-era constructed nuclear units. The spent nuclear fuel area contains respective assemblies, which might be taken by Russians and used for extortion purposes or to put forward accusations that Ukraine or Western partners had attempted to create nuclear weapons at the site.

4. The possible appearance of Wagner Group mercenaries at the Zaporizhzhia NPP will enhance the risk of subversion and Russia's subsequent accusation of Ukraine in any tragedy.

5. Zaporizhzhia NPP needs to urgently become a demilitarised area, together with the nearby city of Energodar, under the control of a special United Nations contingent and regular IAEA mission at the site.

The same approach was used by Russia at the Chernobyl NPP exclusion zone on 24 February 2022, through the Belarussian Polesie State Radioecological Reserve — also an area with restricted access.

The Kremlin, notably, employed the Chernobyl exclusion zone as a warehouse for military supplies and a safe haven for regrouping troops during hostilities around Kyiv.

Moscow took these actions as Ukraine refrained from conducting shelling in the direction of the NPP. Russia ultimately retreated from the area at the end of March though not before destroying a modern laboratory focused on the management of radioactive waste at the NPP and reportedly seizing highly-active samples of radionuclides.

It remains unclear whether the laboratory was plundered by regular infantry/irregular Chechen mercenaries or a special Rosatom team.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has remained quite reticent regarding Russian activities around Chernobyl NPP and growing threats of accidents at the site and in the exclusion zone.

The organisation rather has asserted that the risks are limited and manageable.

Yet another assault in the direction of the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant, located a few hundred kilometres to the west of Zaporizhzhia NPP, has only been averted owing to the valiant resistance of Ukrainian troops.

It should be clear to everyone that Russia has intentionally deployed heavy weaponry against nuclear facilities and used the sites to provide cover to its own troops and blackmail counterparts through methods similarly employed by the worst terrorists in the world.

The democratic world must now robustly respond to these actions through additional joint support to Ukraine's reoccupation operations and Russia's military defeat.

Author bio

Andrii Chubyk is senior fellow on energy, Ukraine and Eastern Europe programme at the Globsec think tank in Bratislava, and worked in 2018-2021 for Ukrainian state-owned energy companies on projects related to electricity and gas sector integration into European energy market.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

UN chief demands access to nuclear plant after new attack

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called on Monday for international inspectors to be given access to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant after Ukraine and Russia traded accusations over the shelling of Europe's largest atomic plant over the weekend.

Conditions met for German nuclear extension, officials say

Conditions have been met for the German government to allow a temporary lifetime extension of three remaining nuclear reactors, according to the Wall Street Journal, as the country is facing a likely shortage of gas this winter.

France, Germany, UK and US discuss Ukraine nuclear plant

The leaders of the United States, Germany, France and the UK held a conference call on Sunday, where they discussed Ukraine's Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, amid an evacuation of some 1,000 nearby residents.


EU should admonish less, and listen more, to the Global South

Whether on Russia, or gas, or climate change, or food security, the EU's constant finger-wagging and moralising is becoming unbearably repetitive and self-defeating. Most countries in the Global South view it as eurocentric and neo-colonial.

News in Brief

  1. EU takes Malta to court over golden passports
  2. EU to ban Russian products worth €7bn a year more
  3. Denmark: CIA did not warn of Nord Stream attack
  4. Drone sightings in the North Sea 'occurred over months'
  5. Gazprom threatens to cut gas deliveries to Europe via Ukraine
  6. New compromise over EU energy emergency measures
  7. 15 states push for EU-wide gas price cap
  8. EU: Nord Stream explosions 'result of a deliberate act'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. The European Association for Storage of EnergyRegister for the Energy Storage Global Conference, held in Brussels on 11-13 Oct.
  2. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  3. European Committee of the RegionsThe 20th edition of EURegionsWeek is ready to take off. Save your spot in Brussels.
  4. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries

Latest News

  1. Everything you need to know about the EU gas price cap plan
  2. Why northeast Italy traded in League for Brothers of Italy
  3. How US tech giants play EU states off against each other
  4. Deregulation of new GMO crops: science or business?
  5. The European shipping giants plying Putin's fossil-fuels trade
  6. Russian ideologue and caviar on latest EU blacklist
  7. Netherlands tops EU social safety net for the poor
  8. New EU rules to make companies liable for their AI failures

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us