Tuesday

28th Mar 2023

Poland and Hungary play for time in 'symbolic' EU court case

Listen to article

Poland and Hungary have been telling the 27 judges of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for the past two days why a new EU mechanism which links subsidies to the respect for the rule of law is not lawful.

Poland and Hungary have challenged the conditionality mechanism, which was agreed by the majority of EU governments and came into force in March, aiming to delay its implementation.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The new rules allow the suspension of EU funds if there are breaches of the rule of law in a member state which risk seriously affecting the sound management of EU subsidies in a "sufficiently direct" manner.

The debate during the Luxembourg hearing was a condensed summary of the ongoing rule-of-law dispute between the EU and the two member states run by nationalist governments.

EU institutions have lined up to defend the new rules and they have been backed up by 10 member states - Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden.

The court hearing came only days after Poland's controversial Constitutional Tribunal challenged the primacy of EU law, the foundation of European integration.

And the EU Commission recently asked for a daily fine against Poland for refusing to adhere to ECJ rulings, all marking an escalation in the legal battle between Warsaw and the EU.

'Unclear'

On Monday and Tuesday (12 October), during the ECJ hearing ,representatives of Poland and Hungary argued that the new rules were unclear, unpredictable and duplicated existing monitoring.

A lawyer for Hungary argued that the legal basis for the new rule was illegal, and lacked proper legal basis.

Lawyers for the two governments said that the minimum standards of the rule of law had not been defined either by the treaties nor by case law, and obligations were not clear.

The two countries also said that protection of EU funds was sufficient under existing financial regulation rules, and that rule of law was adequately defended through the Article 7 sanctions procedure. Hungary and Poland have both been put under the Article 7 sanctions procedure.

"It was impressive to see how many member states, that usually don't show up, supported EU institutions ," John Morijn, a law and politics professor at the University of Groningen, told EUobserver.

Morijn - who was in Luxembourg for the hearing - said it was "impressive" how ECJ president Koen Lenaerts took the floor on Tuesday and asked whether a member state refusing to implement ECJ judgements was a serious rule of law violation and would qualify as such under the new rule - a clear reference to Poland.

"I think that was a very powerful signal to the EU Commission and Council [of member states] that the whole notion of the binding nature of the ECJ rulings is non-negotiable, which is the most important message here," Morijn pointed out.

Morijn said the hearing, where the 27 judges asked questions and made statements rebutting the notion that the rule of law was an undefinable political concept, was "hugely symbolic".

On the Hungarian and Polish arguments, Morijn said it was like being on "two different globes".

"What was worrying to see is that there was no attempt by Poland and Hungary to engage, the purpose was to stall the application of the mechanism," he said.

Next steps

The EU top court's advocate general is expected to deliver his opinion on 2 December, putting it into doubt if the EU top court will rule on the issue this year.

Meanwhile, the European Parliament has accused the EU Commission of delaying the implementation of the conditionality mechanism against Poland and Hungary and has threatened to take the EU executive to court.

The commission has repeatedly said it was preparing cases and would send out the first inquiries to EU members concerned during the autumn.

EU funds at stake not only concern subsidies from the bloc's budget, but also from the €800bn Covid-19 recovery fund.

Hungary and Poland's plans to unlock those funds have not yet been approved by the commission because of concerns over judicial independence and corruption.

Poland questions EU legal primacy in court ruling

Poland's Constitutional Tribunal has ruled that parts of EU treaties were incompatible with the Polish constitution, in a major escalation of the rule-of-law dispute between Warsaw and Brussels.

Commission pledges autumn launch of new rule-of-law tool

"We simply cannot afford to make mistakes and bring cases that when they are endorsed by the council, are then annulled by the court, this would be a terrible disaster," the commission's budget chief told MEPs.

Von der Leyen vows action against Poland

Ursula von der Leyen said the commission might use either an infringement procedure, an EU probe into the ruling, the new tool of conditionality which could lead to the suspension of EU funds, or the Article 7 sanctions procedure.

Agenda

EU leaders meet This WEEK amid EU-Poland clash

Vaccine roll-outs, energy prices, migration and an upcoming climate summit will top the agenda at an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday, while MEPs in Strasbourg tackle rule of law.

Opinion

Why can't we stop marches glorifying Nazism on EU streets?

Every year, neo-Nazis come together to pay tribute to Nazi war criminals and their collaborators, from Benito Mussolini to Rudolf Hess, Ante Pavelić, Hristo Lukov, and of course Adolf Hitler, in events that have become rituals on the extreme-right calendar.

Latest News

  1. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  2. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  3. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  4. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all
  5. Von der Leyen pledges to help return Ukrainian children
  6. EU leaders agree 1m artillery shells for Ukraine
  7. Polish abortion rights activist vows to appeal case
  8. How German business interests have shaped EU climate agenda

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  5. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023
  6. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us