Thursday

29th Oct 2020

Glyphosate: 1.3 million EU citizens call for ban

  • The debate over whether glyphosate is carcinogenic has pitted scientist against scientist, and European citizens against the Commission (Photo: Felix Kindermann / Campact)

A ban on the herbicide glyphosate, sold commercially by Monsanto as Roundup - along with more transparent scientific evaluations of pesticides and a overall reduction in their use - should be an EU priority, citizens said on Monday (20 November) at the European Parliament.

The petition was part of a initiative signed by over 1.3 million Europeans ahead of the final vote (27 November) by EU member states on a five-year renewal of the glyphosate licence, due to expire on 15 December.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The demands were debated during a public hearing held by the European Parliament's environment committee, with the participation of the European Commission.

The request to ban glyphosate, citizens say in the petition, is because the herbicide is "a serious threat to human health" and "its negative impacts on the environment and biodiversity are clearly documented"

Carcinogenic or not?

The International Agency for Research for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified the product as "probably carcinogenic" to humans, despite other studies, such as those from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and other regulatory bodies, suggesting the opposite.

European legislation and procedures, citizens said, should be in line with the 2009 legislation on pesticides, that "prohibits the use of pesticides when there is sufficient evidence in laboratory animals" that can cause cancer.

There is no scientific proof that glyphosate is carcinogenic, EU health commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis said, and dismissed what he called "conspiracy theories" about multinationals' efforts to influence EU decisions.

"There is a wide consensus" about the cancerogenity of glyphsate, Mika Leandro from the Citizen's Commitee said during the debate, which is worrying since "it is found literally everywhere", including in bread and baby food.

If the majority of Europeans took a urine test, they can expect it to be positive for glyphosate, Leandro added.

The toxicity of glyphosate and 'the domino effect' it has on the environment makes the herbicide a "killer machine", said Franziska Achterberg, Greenpeace EU food policy director, speaking at the European Parliament.

However, there are no "scientific...or legal grounds" that justify the ban of glyphosate, the European Commission commented during the debate.

"Glyphosate was evaluated by member states and authorities and the conclusion is always the same," the Commission added, saying a classification as carcinogenic is "not justified".

Last week Andriukaitis suggested applying a "common sense approach" towards glyphosate, rather than one to "create fear".

Lack of transparency

The rest of the petition by European citizens highlights the lack of transparency of EU scientific evaluation procedures for pesticides.

Assessments, Leandro said, should be "objective, transparent and independent", as required in EU pesticide legislation.

Citizens are not satisfied with the way the EU currently carries out regulatory safety evaluations, the petition states, since they "largely rely on unpublished studies" commissioned and submitted by the pesticide producers themselves, while regulatory studies to support pesticide approvals must be commissioned by public authorities.

The "failure" of the EU approval system, said Helmut Burtscher from the Citizens' Committee, is demonstrated by the fact that glyphosate should not have obtained authorisation in the first place, he claimed, since in 2011 it was classified as "probably cancerogenic" but this danger and other scientific studies have been "ignored and denied" by the EU authorities.

The EFSA report about carcinogenicity, added Burtscher, is basically "an exercise in copy-paste" and the majority of their studies are not available and cannot be examined by the AIRC.

Securing food supplies

The third and final proposal of the citizens' initiative concerns an EU-wide mandatory reduction target for the use of pesticides, since more than 480 other pesticide substances are currently authorised for use in the EU, while the relevant legislation states only "that pesticides should only be used when all other methods have failed."

EU pesticides legislation, the petition adds, also "mandates EU member states to establish concrete measures and objectives to reduce overall pesticide use", but states are not "sufficiently implementing the directive" and the European Commission "has yet to evaluate its effect."

The ultimate aim, citizens said, is that the EU should achieve a "pesticide-free future".

"We have already the strictest targets in the world" countered European People's Party's MEP Elisabetta Gardini. "What kind of agriculture are they looking for? They think about an elite agriculture, for rich people" MEP added.

The European Commission agreed on the need for improving implementation of the EU legislation on pesticides, and said that it will "evaluate national plans of action" and continue its monitoring activity during 2018.

"Pesticides won't ever win a beauty competition", admitted commissioner Andriukaitis but they have an important role in "guaranteeing adequate food supplies".

Signatures for the initiative were collected thanks to a coalition of farmers and environment protection associations and NGOs, Citizens' Committee's representative said.

The required statement of support (1 million signatures) was achieved in less than five months, which was a "record" never achieved before, Leandro said during the hearing.

EU fails again to agree glyphosate renewal

Member states failed to agree on a licence renewal for weedkiller glyphosate. A new vote will take place before 22 November at the European Commission's appeal committee.

EU postpones decision on glyphosate

Member state representatives met on Wednesday to discuss a renewal of the licence of the controversial weedkiller. 'At the conclusion of the meeting, no vote was taken', the commission said.

Investigation

EU weed-killer evidence 'written by Monsanto'

The EU's favourable opinion of the weed-killer chemical glyphosate was partially based on scientific evidence heavily influenced by weed-killer manufacturer Monsanto.

News in Brief

  1. Kaczyński attacks feminism in apocalyptic terms
  2. US official berates new EU farm policy
  3. Corona death-toll in Europe up 40 percent
  4. Turkey's France boycott goes against EU trade deals
  5. Study identifies four problems in political social media
  6. Court: Belgium violated human rights with Sudan deportations
  7. Frontex launches inquiry into alleged pushbacks
  8. Italy: Police uses teargas against anti-lockdown protests

Opinion

Why am I not seeing this ad?

The micro-targeting of narrow, homogenous groups of people with very specific messages that exploit their vulnerabilities, makes it easier than ever to distort political debate, pushing people deeper into their echo chambers and stimulating single-issue voting.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Belarus: Where's the EU when you need it?
  2. MEPs hear clash over occupied Hungarian drama school
  3. EU Commission sticks to €20bn AI target, despite Covid
  4. Confusion over Frontex's Greek pushback investigation
  5. MEPs push for limited 'right-to-repair' on consumer devices
  6. What American decline means for Europe
  7. Post-Covid is a different world - EU needs to secure a role
  8. Post-Brexit UK vs EU on Ukraine's future

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us