30th Mar 2023


Polish MEP also went on freelance Azerbaijan trip

  • Polish MEP Tomasz Poręba was freelancing in Azerbaijan, his lawyers said (Photo:
Listen to article

Another MEP's undeclared Azerbaijan trip is helping to build pressure for reform in the EU Parliament.

"This is a great moment for us today to strengthen our cooperation. As a Polish parliamentarian, I will make efforts regarding strengthening the cooperation between Polish and Azerbaijani businesses".

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

So said Tomasz Poręba from Poland's ruling Law and Justice party on Azeri state media in Baku last July.

He called for closer ties between Poland, Europe and Azerbaijan in an interview entitled 'Poland needs gas', which Azerbaijan wants to sell to the EU in larger quantities.

Poręba was there as an MEP and as a member of the EU Parliament's transport committee (Tran), according to an official report by Azerbaijan's parliament, the Milli Majlis, and multiple Azeri-government media stories at the time.

He also visited the war-torn Nagorno-Karabakh region, where senior EU diplomats fear to tread in case it inflames tensions with Armenia.

But if he was representing the European Parliament, Poręba didn't bother to declare the visit in his EU Parliament register, as the code of conduct requires.

And the Tran committee has no record of him going there on its behalf, in what amounts to deja vu on three other MEPs, who undertook similar trips last year.

When Swedish investigative news site Blankspot contacted Poręba, his Belgian law firm replied that Poręba wasn't in Azerbaijan in his capacity as an MEP, but merely as president of New Direction, his rightwing think-tank in Brussels.

Poręba was accompanied by New Direction's executive director Witold de Chevilly, the law firm said.

The think-tank paid for the whole trip, the lawyers said.

And if Azeri media claimed Poręba had represented anyone other than New Direction that was simply the journalists' mistake, they added.

But even if New Direction did pay for everything, the MEP should still have declared this as a gift worth over €150 in his EU Parliament registry — which he didn't.

And if Poręba's trip was nothing to do with his MEP status, then Azerbaijan's EU embassy told a contradictory story.

Poręba and the three other MEPs who visited Azerbaijan last year (Latvian socialist Anders Ameriks, Slovenian conservative Franc Bogovič, and German liberal Engin Eroglu) were all invited by the "EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee in the Parliament of Azerbaijan", the embassy told EUobserver on 3 February.

And Azerbaijan's EU ambassador, Vaqif Sadıqov, helped organise their trips as part of his normal duties, the embassy added in a lengthy email, which never mentioned New Direction.

Meanwhile, some of the MEPs later admitted Azerbaijan had paid for their hotels in Baku and for excursions to the mountainous and remote Nagorno-Karabakh region.

But the Azeri embassy denied this, further muddying the waters.

"Neither Mr Poręba, nor other members of the European Parliament received 'any free hospitality'. If you are referring to small gestures such as offering tea, coffee, or soft drinks, then, yes, they were provided," it told EUobserver.

"Expenses such as flights, hotels are covered by the visiting guests themselves," it said.

There is no suggestion any of the four MEPs broke laws in their dealings with the petro-dictatorship.

But Azerbaijan has a track record of EU disinformation as well as so-called 'caviar diplomacy' — lavish hospitality for foreign VIPs, making it a controversial friend.

The way Poręba and others rode roughshod over EU Parliament transparency rules also makes Brussels look bad, in the wake of the Qatargate bribery scandal.

One fellow MEP, German Green Niklas Nienaß, resigned from a parliament cross-party group, following earlier revelations of their freewheeling Azeri diplomacy.

And this investigation sheds light on how foreign regimes make friends and influence people in the EU power-bubble.


Zooming back in on Poręba, the 49-year old Pole didn't start out as Azerbaijan's friend.

Baku declared him persona non grata when he travelled to Nagorno-Karabakh in 2010 — long before Azerbaijan reconquered parts of the region from Karabakh-Armenian forces in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War in 2020.

Poręba went there as an EU Parliament rapporteur on Armenia.

But in 2019, he signed a letter declaring full respect for Azerbaijan's territorial integrity and his visa-ban was lifted.

His trip back to Azerbaijan in July 2022 was his first one since then.

He didn't give a reason for the U-turn in his sympathies, but ever since his return from Baku, Poręba has worked hard to tie Europe and Poland closer to Azerbaijan.

He submitted a proposal to link European transport corridors to Azerbaijan via Turkey last November.

He convened a special meeting with Azerbaijan's transport minister about the corridors in December.

And he discussed the same topic with a think-tank belonging to Tural Ganyaliyev, an Azerbaijani MP who accompanied him, as well as the other three MEPs, on last year's Azerbaijan trips.

Poręba and his former travel companion, de Chevilly, have even advocated for the opening of the Zangezur Corridor — a highly sensitive route, whose status is still being negotiated by Armenia and Azerbaijan and which remains closed for now.

And Azeri media continue to report that Poręba hosts his meetings as a Tran committee member, even as Tran says it has no record of him representing them at such events.

Blurred lines

On occasion, Poręba's engagement goes way beyond any EU mandate he might have.

When Azerbaijan attacked Armenia in September 2022, Poręba took to the airwaves to denounce Armenia as a close ally of Russia.

In December, he also gave a public statement on the quality of an Azerbaijani football club, Qarabag Agdam, while adding that he had helped two Polish coaches to get an internship with the team.

This is how Poręba, once an enemy-of-the-state, became another friend of Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev in the heart of the EU.

And this is why MEPs' blurred lines between freelance friendships, official committee roles, and their gold-and-blue EU Parliament badges create cause for concern in the post-Qatargate atmosphere.

"Let's hope that after Qatargate we don't uncover a caviargate. Votes on upcoming reports on Armenia and on Azerbaijan will be telling," French liberal MEP Nathalie Loiseau, who chairs the EU Parliament's subcommittee on security and defence, tweeted shortly after this story first came out on Wednesday (8 February).

This article was altered on 8 March 2023 to clarify Tomasz Poręba's reporting obligations. The original text said: "But Poręba didn't bother to declare the visit in his EU Parliament register, as the code of conduct requires." This was changed to: "But if he was representing the European Parliament, Poręba didn't bother to declare the visit in his EU Parliament register, as the code of conduct requires." Nathalie Loiseau's quote's was added shortly after publication on 8 February 2023.

Author bio

Rasmus Canbäck and Sascha Düerkop are journalists with the Stockholm-based Swedish-German investigative platform Blankspot.

MEPs scramble to declare paid trips post-Qatargate

MEPs are scrambling to declare trips paid by countries in the wake of a corruption scandal that has landed the parliament's former vice-president in pre-trial detention. Among them are two MEPs who had chaired the EU Qatar friendship group.


What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking

Perhaps even more surprising to the West was the fact that the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal was not brokered by the United States, or the European Union, but by the People's Republic of China. Since when was China mediating peace agreements?


Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Latest News

  1. The overlooked 'crimes against children' ICC arrest warrant
  2. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  3. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  4. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  5. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  6. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  7. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  8. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us