6th Jun 2023

EU lawmakers 'hold breath' on eve of AI vote

  • Critics says the parliament's draft still falls short when it comes to protection of migrants and asylum seekers (Photo: Telegram)
Listen to article

European lawmakers regulating the risks of artificial intelligence are likely to face resistance from EU states ahead of negotiations later this year.

But even within the EU Parliament, some of the key MEPs driving the draft bill on artificial intelligence known as the AI Act, are worried about an upcoming vote among their own peers.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

"I'm holding my breath until the last second," said Romanian liberal MEP Dragoș Tudorache, earlier this week.

Tudorache, along with Italian socialist lawmaker Brando Benifei, are the parliament's lead negotiators on the Act.

First proposed by the European Commission in 2021, the bill comes at a time when general purpose AI like Chat GPT have exploded onto the market.

The Council, representing member states, reached its negotiating position last December.

Now the parliament's committee is set to vote on a draft put forward by Tudorache and Benifei before it goes to the plenary in June.

"This is the kind of negotiation where no one can leave the room happy or unhappy," said Tudorache. "The key is to retain control and human oversight and trustworthiness," he said.

Tudorache described it as the "magic touch", whereby the future powered by AI is one where humans are still in control.

"If we don't get that control right, then you might have this dystopian view that are being expressed by many," he said.

The new rulebook includes placing an outright ban on certain practices, while listing others as high-risk.

Unlike the parliament, the council has stopped short on slapping an outright ban on predictive policing, emotion recognition, and facial recognition in public spaces as part of a security-centric mix.

Not everyone is keen on some of these bans, including within the parliament's Renew Europe, the liberal faction where Tudorache is seated.

With some exceptions, the centre-right EPP is not happy with the bans either, while the Greens and socialists are in favour. Those tricky questions and positions are likely to play out at a committee level vote on 11 May.

So far, civil society has broadly welcomed the parliament's draft given its beefed up rights safeguards.

"The parliament has really listened to what civil society has asked, and has made some quite big changes," said Daniel Leufer, a senior policy analyst at Access Now, an NGO that defends digital rights.

This includes transparency obligations and fundamental rights impact assessments for users, he said.

Such transparency is needed to prevent scandals from erupting. Recently, an investigation by the Amsterdam-based LightHouse Reports, revealed that Spain had been using secretive AI to crack down on fraud and reduce public spending on its sick leave benefits.

But at the same time, Leufer worries about loopholes that could derail the regulation when it comes to classifying high risks.

"It's very important that the high risk classification process doesn't contain any loopholes that would allow unscrupulous providers to exempt themselves without consequences and without public oversight," he said.

Despite that possibility, the parliament's extended list of bans is also being praised.

Sarah Chander, an AI expert at the Brussels-based European Digital Rights (EDRi), said it would send a clear message to governments and AI developers that "some uses of AI are just too harmful to be allowed."

But this still falls short when it comes to protecting migrants from AI harm, including where AI is used to facilitate pushbacks, she says.

The proposed ban on predictive policing needs improvement to cover location-based predictive policing, essentially a form of automated racial profiling, she said.

Amnesty International made similar comments in a letter sent to MEPs earlier this month.

"The draft AI Act does not guarantee people on the move the same level of protections against AI-induced harm that are afforded to European citizens," stated the letter.


How far will we — and the EU — let AI go?

Airbnb has already patented AI software that can supposedly predict a person's traits and their actions based on data it holds on them from social media. That could determine how much a consumer pays — or even gets a booking.


Big Tech's attempt to water down the EU AI act revealed

The launch of ChatGPT has sparked a worldwide debate on Artificial Intelligence systems. Amidst Big Tech's proclamations that these AI systems will revolutionise our daily lives, the companies are engaged in a fierce lobbying battle to water-down regulations.

MEPs push for world's toughest rules on AI

The aim is "to avoid a controlled society based on AI, instead to make AI support more freedom and human development, not a securitarian nightmare" a key MEP on the file said.


Visions of war and peace in Europe This WEEK

Russian president Vladimir Putin will cheer on a mini war-parade in Moscow on Tuesday, as German chancellor Olaf Scholz speaks of peace in Europe in Strasbourg.

Predicting migration: the opaque science behind AI technologies

European states and international organisations have developed technologies to detect migration patterns and predict the number of people from third countries seeking asylum in the EU. But doubts have been raised about the effectiveness and desirability of using predictive technologies.


EU lobbying clean-up — what happened to that?

Six months after Qatargate, as institutional inertia and parliamentary privileges weigh in, the sense of gravity and collective resolve have all but disappeared. MEPs show little enthusiasm for reform of the rules that today allow them significant outside paid activities.

Latest News

  1. No clear 'Qatargate effect' — but only half voters aware of EU election
  2. Part of EU middle class 'being squeezed out', MEP warns
  3. Migration commissioner: Greek pushback film 'clear deportation'
  4. In 2024, Europe's voters need to pick a better crop of MEPs
  5. ECB president grilled over €135bn interest payout to commercial banks
  6. EU political ads rules could be 'hotbed for retaliatory flagging'
  7. Final steps for EU's due diligence on supply chains law
  8. Top EU court rules Poland's court reforms 'infringe law'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us