It's Growth Week

In common understanding, the dogma with GDP has been, GDP goes up is good, GDP goes down is bad. Slowly, it seems though that this dogmatic approach to measuring good or bad is being questioned.

As Philippe Lambert, one of the main organisers of the Beyond Growth conference taking place in Brussels next week, told James Kanter of the EU Scream podcast, "If you consider that the goal of the economy is to maximize and concentrate the income and the wealth in fewer and fewer hands down, it works perfectly fine," Lambert said.

But if you want a more broad measure, it doesn't. And this is obviously because what GDP obviously does not take into account is human wellbeing or ecological damage resulting from its growth. Or the even simpler fact that we live on a planet with finite resources while expecting infinite growth.

In the past decade or so, this understanding has slowly been trickling through to policy makers, especially on the left and for the greens.

GDP, while concretely measurable, is not an indicator free from morality. Ignoring consequences of optimising for a single variable is just as much a moral (and political) choice as optimising for indicators that in a purely economical sense might be less sound or more qualitative.

But what should we use then? How do we measure prosperity or wellbeing of not only humans, but also the environment and all other organisms?

These are some of the questions that will be discussed in our Growth Week, a themed week exploring what growth is, how to measure it, for whom growth works (and for whom it does not) and if it's actually what we as a society should be aiming for.

Expect interviews with some of the main economic thinkers on the matter, and background articles on moving past our current view on what growth should look like.

Check out all the coverage we publish on our dedicated Growth Week page.