Sunday

23rd Feb 2020

Opinion

Why majority voting on EU taxation is a bad idea

  • This is merely the latest attempt by EU institutions to gradually abolish any need of unanimity in the council on tax issues (Photo: ptmoney.com)

While most Europeans were still unwrapping their Christmas gifts, the European Commission started a new push to transition to qualified majority voting (QMV) on tax policy.

An initiative kicked off on 20 December called for "more efficient EU law-making procedures," and was followed up by an official communication in January, entitled 'Towards a more efficient and democratic decision making in EU tax policy'.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or join as a group

The latter was coupled with an analysis explaining how the 'passerelle clause' from the Lisbon treaty could be used to introduce QMV in "areas such as common foreign and security policy, taxation or social policy."

It is merely the latest attempt by EU institutions to gradually abolish any need of unanimity in the council on tax issues.

And while chances are slim of this happening anytime soon – abolishing unanimity would need unanimity itself – the commission has made clear that this is a fight it is ready to fight till the end: "the question is no longer whether there is a need to move away from unanimity in taxation, but rather how and when to do it."

The argument made by EU institutions as well as some member states of them being tired of being held back by naysayers in their integration plans is understandable.

It is certainly also true that decision-making processes could be accelerated by abolishing unanimity votes.

Some down sides

Nonetheless, the plans of the EU would still be highly detrimental.

It is, after all, not by accident that tax policy (as well as the other fields the commission is looking at) is considered a "sensitive" matter.

Indeed, introducing QMV on taxation would include grave dangers and problems, several of which we at the Austrian Economics Center have looked into in more detail.

One of the biggest concerns sceptical member states have put forward is that abolishing unanimity would sooner or later lead to complete harmonisation of tax policy in Europe.

It is something the commission is certainly aware off when it writes that its newest push does not "aim to shift towards a system of harmonised personal and corporate tax rates across the EU."

Nonetheless, other parts of the new documents show a different picture.

For instance, the commission states that moving to QMV would make it possible to avert "harmful tax competition and aggressive tax planning," and bemoans the fact that "as the tax base becomes more mobile, member states are increasingly constrained in the execution of their fiscal sovereignty."

The four-step plan of gradual transition from unanimity to QMV the commission has published goes in the same direction.

QMV should, at first, be introduced on issues like tax fraud and evasion as well as tax measures to fight climate change and improving public health, i.e. steps that will be hard to reject for many.

Eventually, "step 4 would allow a shift to QMV for major tax projects," which will include a common consolidated corporate tax base and the introduction of a (just rejected) digital tax.

Who is to say the EU is stopping here, with unanimity already being broken down entirely? It could instead go much further.

It is not overly surprising then why several member states, especially Nordic and Baltic countries, have reacted with such sensitivity to the commission's proposal.

Harmonising tax rates would, after all, probably not mean harmonising all tax systems to low rates – such as those in Ireland, for instance, but much rather an increase of taxes across the continent.

Remarks by Bruno Le Maire at last week's World Economic Forum in Davos, where the French finance minister called for a worldwide minimum corporate tax rate, certainly will not be reassuring either that this would not be the case.

Not only that getting rid of unanimity votes on this controversial topic would potentially eliminate tax competition, and in case of high minimum tax rates, see Europe lose out to global competition.

Losing veto power on tax issues would also be a significant intrusion on sovereignty.

If EU institutions, with the support of the (qualified) majority, could introduce their own taxes on European individuals and businesses or overrule other member states to adopt specific tax policies in their own countries, there is little point in still speaking of a national sovereignty to levy taxes.

Instead of trying to get rid of a significant check against excessive tax levying, the European commission should do its best to leave tax policy to member states, thus spurring tax competition, and focus itself on truly deepening the single market by eliminating and reducing barriers to trade and do business.

And instead of trying to introduce minimum taxes and move tax rates of other countries to one's own high level, governments like the one in France should think about becoming more competitive themselves.

Author bio

Kai Weiss is a research fellow at the Austrian Economics Center.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

The EU's tax haven blacklist - impressive or impotent?

One year ago, the European Union published its first ever blacklist of tax havens. It is crucial that EU governments help end the era of tax havens to ensure the billions currently hidden from public coffers.

The great EU corporate tax lie

Attempts by the European Commission to 'sell' the new Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base as a measure against tax avoidance are disingenuous at best, say three MEPs from smaller member states.

Are art 'freeports' tip of EU tax avoidance iceberg?

MEPs have raised concerns about the risks presented by Le Freeport, a 22,000 square meter high-security facility located near Luxembourg airport, where goods can be stored with confidentiality - and without being taxed.

Why Miroslav Lajčák is the wrong choice for EU envoy

The EU could blow up the Kosovo-Serbia negotiations' reset. Should Miroslav Lajčák indeed be appointed, the two senior EU diplomats dealing with Kosovo would both come from the small minority of member states that do not recognise Kosovo.

News in Brief

  1. Bulgarian PM investigated over 'money laundering'
  2. Greenpeace breaks into French nuclear plant
  3. Germany increases police presence after shootings
  4. NGO: US and EU 'watering-down' tax reform prior to G20
  5. Iran: parliamentary elections, conservatives likely to win
  6. Belgian CEOs raise alarm on political crisis
  7. Germans voice anger on rise of far-right terrorism
  8. EU leaders' budget summit drags on overnight

Second-hand cars flaw in EU Green Deal

The moment Europe revels in its carbon-free transport system, most of the cars that emitted too much for EU standards will still be driving around for years somewhere else in the world.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  2. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  3. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Climate Action Weeks in December

Latest News

  1. No breakthrough at EU budget summit
  2. EU leaders struggling to break budget deadlock
  3. German ex-commissioner Oettinger lands Orban job
  4. How big is Germany's far-right problem?
  5. Plastic and carbon proposals to help plug Brexit budget gap
  6. Sassoli repeats EU budget rejection warning
  7. Why Miroslav Lajčák is the wrong choice for EU envoy
  8. Unhappy EU leaders begin budget haggle

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us