Monday

17th Jun 2019

Opinion

Why majority voting on EU taxation is a bad idea

  • This is merely the latest attempt by EU institutions to gradually abolish any need of unanimity in the council on tax issues (Photo: ptmoney.com)

While most Europeans were still unwrapping their Christmas gifts, the European Commission started a new push to transition to qualified majority voting (QMV) on tax policy.

An initiative kicked off on 20 December called for "more efficient EU law-making procedures," and was followed up by an official communication in January, entitled 'Towards a more efficient and democratic decision making in EU tax policy'.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

The latter was coupled with an analysis explaining how the 'passerelle clause' from the Lisbon treaty could be used to introduce QMV in "areas such as common foreign and security policy, taxation or social policy."

It is merely the latest attempt by EU institutions to gradually abolish any need of unanimity in the council on tax issues.

And while chances are slim of this happening anytime soon – abolishing unanimity would need unanimity itself – the commission has made clear that this is a fight it is ready to fight till the end: "the question is no longer whether there is a need to move away from unanimity in taxation, but rather how and when to do it."

The argument made by EU institutions as well as some member states of them being tired of being held back by naysayers in their integration plans is understandable.

It is certainly also true that decision-making processes could be accelerated by abolishing unanimity votes.

Some down sides

Nonetheless, the plans of the EU would still be highly detrimental.

It is, after all, not by accident that tax policy (as well as the other fields the commission is looking at) is considered a "sensitive" matter.

Indeed, introducing QMV on taxation would include grave dangers and problems, several of which we at the Austrian Economics Center have looked into in more detail.

One of the biggest concerns sceptical member states have put forward is that abolishing unanimity would sooner or later lead to complete harmonisation of tax policy in Europe.

It is something the commission is certainly aware off when it writes that its newest push does not "aim to shift towards a system of harmonised personal and corporate tax rates across the EU."

Nonetheless, other parts of the new documents show a different picture.

For instance, the commission states that moving to QMV would make it possible to avert "harmful tax competition and aggressive tax planning," and bemoans the fact that "as the tax base becomes more mobile, member states are increasingly constrained in the execution of their fiscal sovereignty."

The four-step plan of gradual transition from unanimity to QMV the commission has published goes in the same direction.

QMV should, at first, be introduced on issues like tax fraud and evasion as well as tax measures to fight climate change and improving public health, i.e. steps that will be hard to reject for many.

Eventually, "step 4 would allow a shift to QMV for major tax projects," which will include a common consolidated corporate tax base and the introduction of a (just rejected) digital tax.

Who is to say the EU is stopping here, with unanimity already being broken down entirely? It could instead go much further.

It is not overly surprising then why several member states, especially Nordic and Baltic countries, have reacted with such sensitivity to the commission's proposal.

Harmonising tax rates would, after all, probably not mean harmonising all tax systems to low rates – such as those in Ireland, for instance, but much rather an increase of taxes across the continent.

Remarks by Bruno Le Maire at last week's World Economic Forum in Davos, where the French finance minister called for a worldwide minimum corporate tax rate, certainly will not be reassuring either that this would not be the case.

Not only that getting rid of unanimity votes on this controversial topic would potentially eliminate tax competition, and in case of high minimum tax rates, see Europe lose out to global competition.

Losing veto power on tax issues would also be a significant intrusion on sovereignty.

If EU institutions, with the support of the (qualified) majority, could introduce their own taxes on European individuals and businesses or overrule other member states to adopt specific tax policies in their own countries, there is little point in still speaking of a national sovereignty to levy taxes.

Instead of trying to get rid of a significant check against excessive tax levying, the European commission should do its best to leave tax policy to member states, thus spurring tax competition, and focus itself on truly deepening the single market by eliminating and reducing barriers to trade and do business.

And instead of trying to introduce minimum taxes and move tax rates of other countries to one's own high level, governments like the one in France should think about becoming more competitive themselves.

Author bio

Kai Weiss is a research fellow at the Austrian Economics Center.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

The EU's tax haven blacklist - impressive or impotent?

One year ago, the European Union published its first ever blacklist of tax havens. It is crucial that EU governments help end the era of tax havens to ensure the billions currently hidden from public coffers.

The great EU corporate tax lie

Attempts by the European Commission to 'sell' the new Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base as a measure against tax avoidance are disingenuous at best, say three MEPs from smaller member states.

Are art 'freeports' tip of EU tax avoidance iceberg?

MEPs have raised concerns about the risks presented by Le Freeport, a 22,000 square meter high-security facility located near Luxembourg airport, where goods can be stored with confidentiality - and without being taxed.

Catalonia MEPs are a judicial, not political, issue

Carles Puigdemont and Toni Comin currently live outside Spain. They were prosecuted for the serious crimes, and they have fled justice. It is not possible to judge in absentia in Spain, where the justice system protects the rights of defendants.

News in Brief

  1. EU plans to restructure eurozone bonds
  2. EU ups US imports in beef deal
  3. Unicef: UK among 'least family-friendly' in Europe
  4. Czech PM: No joint 'V4' candidate in commission race
  5. Johnson tops first round to replace May, three eliminated
  6. Bratislava will host new European Labour Authority
  7. Juncker cautions against further climate goals
  8. Study: Counterfeit medicine is a 'growing threat' in EU

Six takeaways on digital disinformation at EU elections

For example, Germany's primetime TV news reported that 47 percent of political social media discussions were related to the extreme-right AfD party, when in fact this was the case only for Twitter - used by only four percent of Germans.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  3. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  5. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  6. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  7. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  8. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  9. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody

Latest News

  1. 'Russian sources' targeted EU elections with disinformation
  2. Top EU jobs summit dominates This WEEK
  3. EP parties planning 'coalition agenda' ahead of jobs summit
  4. MEP blasts Portugal over football whistleblower
  5. Catalonia MEPs are a judicial, not political, issue
  6. Meet the lawyer taking the EU migration policy to the ICC
  7. Europe's oil supplies 'at risk' after tanker attacks
  8. EU paths fork for Albania and North Macedonia

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  2. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  4. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  5. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  10. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  11. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  12. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us