10th Dec 2022


Nato's options if Putin strikes Polish airfield on front line

  • US-made Patriot air-defence systems (Photo:
Listen to article

Nato would likely fire on military bases in Russia, if it hit ones in Poland, in a "proportionate" exchange of conventional air strikes, a European former military chief has said.

The risk of escalation beyond Ukraine has reared its head amid suspected Russian sabotage of undersea gas pipelines and German rail travel.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

"Hybrid and cyber-attacks can trigger Article 5," Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said on Tuesday (11 October) in reaction, referring to Nato's mutual-defence pact.

Russian president Vladimir Putin has also threatened to strike at Western arms deliveries to Ukraine in the past and to defend annexed regions in eastern Ukraine with nuclear weapons.

One potential target is the military airfield in Rzeszów in eastern Poland, 50km from the Ukrainian border, where Western countries have been flying in arms for onward deliveries.

The US put Patriot air-defence systems there in March and Russian cruise missiles have already rained down in nearby western Ukraine.

If Russia struck Rzeszów "Nato, as per its doctrine, will respond in a proportionate measure," Luigi Binelli Mantelli, a retired naval admiral who was chief of defence staff in Italy from 2013 to 2015, told EUobserver.

"Nato will respond showing will and determination to discourage any further action from the opponent, while avoiding any damage that can lead to escalation. For instance, avoiding collateral damage," he said.

"In other words, it's a simple prediction of losses to be inflicted possibly equal to those which occurred due to the [Russian] first strike," Binelli Mantelli added, speaking in a personal capacity.

"Nato would have to decide how to retaliate, choosing from a suite of [conventional] options that Nato military commanders would propose," Jamie Shea, a former senior Nato official, also told this website.

"A full-scale Russian invasion of Nato territory would be different to a single missile strike as then Nato would be immediately engaged in repelling Russia back over its borders," he added.

Meanwhile, the risk Putin might use small-sized nuclear weapons to gain a battlefield advantage inside Ukraine was nil, said Pavel Baev, an expert on Russian security at the Peace Research Institute Oslo.

"It's quite impossible because Russian troops don't have protective gear and cannot possibly operate on a nuclear battlefield," he said.

Nuclear taboo

A "non-strategic" nuclear strike on Ukraine to cause terror and leave behind scorched earth in the event of a conventional Russian defeat "could be more feasible", he added.

But Russia had not placed warheads and delivery systems in place together with specially trained forces ready to pull the nuclear trigger, Baev said.

Any real preparations would be "absolutely detectable", he said. "The Russian ability to camouflage anything of significance in this war has been dismal," he added.

If the Russian leader did break the global nuclear taboo, which has held since 1945, Nato would also react with conventional strikes in a show of deterrent force, Shea and Baev said.

"I wouldn't rule out conventional military strikes by the US and its allies against a limited number of Russian targets, such as shipping or air bases, to warn Putin against further escalation," Shea, who now teaches war studies at University of Exeter in the UK, said.

"As long as Nato territory is not attacked with nuclear weapons, I would rule out a Western nuclear response," he said.

Nato would likely "target very precise [Russian] military assets, minimising 'collateral damage'," Baev said. "Naval platforms are one such option, the [Russian] bases in Syria — another one, the bases in the Arctic — yet another," he added.

"For Nato, the key message is that a first Russian use (even if testing) would be answered by conventional means — and with devastating efficiency," he said.

Other Western measures might include deliveries of the US' "most long-range weapons" to Ukraine, Shea said, "so that Kyiv can retaliate appropriately in a way that will exact a high price on the Russian military".

They might also include a Western blockade of Russia's Kaliningrad exclave in the Baltic Sea, Baev said.

Putin's logic

For his part, Binelli Mantelli voiced scepticism on nuclear escalation.

"I don't think Putin is so naive as to use nuclear weapons, because he cannot be totally defeated in his [conventional] campaign. Russia can sustain its efforts for a long time, longer than we can imagine," he said.

Putin's best option would be to cede most of the conquered territories in return for guarantees Ukraine would never join Nato, the Italian admiral added, in what the Kremlin could still present as a victory.

But for Shea, the political logic of Putin's position was becoming more "dangerous" for the West with each war crime in Ukraine.

"Putin has already lost any opportunity to appear as a peacemaker given the brutal tactics he has used and the mounting charge sheet of war crimes that will be laid at the door of his regime and Putin personally," Shea said.

"If Putin backs down from his threat to use nuclear weapons this will be seen as the success of US and Nato," Shea added.

"His bluff will have been called and he will be weakened politically inside Russia," Shea said.


Putin and the threat of a tactical nuclear attack

Nato could be in a position to experience nuclear deterrence in an entirely unexpected form, requiring skilled diplomacy and even a willingness for some compromise, however bitter, to avoid disaster.


A plea to the EU from inside Tehran's Evin jail

As a result of my peaceful civil activism, I have been arrested 13 times, undergone five trials, and been sentenced to 34 years of imprisonment and 154 lashes in total. I am currently in Evrin prison, without the slightest regret.


No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU

The European Commission has asked the member states' leaders assembling in Brussels next week for the customary end-of-year European Council to approve EU candidate status for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Doing so would be a mistake.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  4. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  5. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos

Latest News

  1. EU Commission silent on Greek spyware sale to Madagascar
  2. A plea to the EU from inside Tehran's Evin jail
  3. EU lets Croatia into Schengen, keeps Bulgaria and Romania out
  4. Energy crisis costs thousands of EU jobs, but industrial output stable
  5. Illegal pushbacks happening daily in Croatia, says NGO
  6. No, Bosnia and Herzegovina is not ready for the EU
  7. EU takes legal action against China over Lithuania
  8. EU Commission shoring up children's rights of same-sex parents

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  2. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  4. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us