Thursday

18th Jul 2019

EU court asks for reform of carbon emission permits

Exxon Mobil, Dow Chemical, Shell and other companies had challenged an EU decision to reduce the number of carbon emission permits they were allocated for free under the European emissions trading scheme (ETS).

But the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on Thursday (28 April) that they in fact had been given too many.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

The European Commission uses a ’correction factor’ to ensure the allocation of free allowances doesn’t exceed the cap allowed under EU law. But the ECJ said that it used erroneous data as the basis of its calculations, making the number of free emissions too high.

The court gave the commission ten months to correct the number of free allowances.

The commission is now expected to come to a lower number of free allowances to distribute. That would increase costs for the heavy polluters that had lodged the complaint.

”The commission will study in detail the implications of the judgment and will make further announcements in due time”, a spokeswoman said on Thursday.

She added that the commission made proposals to improve certainty for the industry regarding future free allocation, such as a fixed auction share, a stable carbon leakage list and predictable benchmarks, in its proposal for the next stage of the ETS - phase IV that will stretch over 2021-2030.

”These elements of the commission proposal aim to reduce, if not avoid, the need for a correction factor to apply in phase IV," the spokeswoman said.

She added that "a recent expert meeting has confirmed market analysts' views that the commission proposal is successful in this regard".

THE ECJ's ruling however created confusion in the European Parliament, where deputies are planning the future of the scheme.

The commission has suggested to maintain the current proportions between free and paying emissions, but this could change in the wake of the ruling.

”According to early analysis, the auction share could move from 57 percent to 58 percent” said British Conservative MEP, Ian Duncan, who is the parliament’s main negotiator of the phase IV system.

”We need the commission to clarify this as soon as possible.”

EU institutions say the ETS is their main tool to address climate change and reach the EU target of a 40-percent reduction of carbon emissions by 2030.

But the system is not functioning well. Economic problems have lowered the demand for paying emission allowances, making their price plummet.

Furthermore, some emissions are given for free to industries that could move their production out of Europe to countries with less ambitious climate measures. This is what is called the carbon leakage.

Femke de Jong, ETS specialist at the NGO Carbon Market Watch, said there was no evidence that a carbon leakage actually happens.

”It’s even less likely to do so after the Paris agreement”, she argued.

Meanwhile, WWF Europe urged EU lawmakers to make sure that polluters pay for their greenhouse emissions.

“The EU ETS needs to be reformed in order to make polluters pay, rather than paying polluters, as today’s ruling confirms. Policy makers must ensure that the European carbon market delivers more and faster emission reductions, and commit to phasing out free pollution permits,” said Imke Luebbeke, the environmental NGO's head of climate and energy.

Opinion

EU must scrap carbon compensation scheme

One of the main planks of the EU Emissions Trading System rewards polluters and must be abolished, says Peter Eriksson of the Greens/EFA group.

EU carbon credits drop below €6

Has EU's flagship climate tool still an influence on moving industry away from fossil fuels? Emitting a tonne of carbon dioxide in Europe has become 25 percent cheaper since the start of 2016.

Member states vary in EU 'polluter pays' rules

An EU directive aimed at supporting the "polluter pays principle" has resulted in a patchwork situation, but the European Commission is not yet ready to propose a change.

Analysis

What did we learn from the von der Leyen vote?

The vote on von der Leyen showed the fundamental change in EU politics. The rise of the European Parliament, the power of political parties, and the fragmentation of politics, are new realities to be taken into account.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  5. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  7. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  8. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  9. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  10. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North

Latest News

  1. Timmermans: von der Leyen will be tough on rule of law
  2. Timmermans trolls 'idiot' Brexit negotiators
  3. Rudderless Europe: Will real Germany please stand up?
  4. PiS & Fidesz claim credit for von der Leyen victory
  5. Von der Leyen faces gender battle for commission posts
  6. EU proposes yearly rule of law 'reports'
  7. Poland 'optimistic' despite new EU law checks
  8. What did we learn from the von der Leyen vote?

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us